Quote Originally Posted by Bagwan View Post
I guess it's why stewarding decisions can be so difficult .
There are always two sides .

Again , it was a great vid to illustrate that , to be sure .
I can certainly see your point .


It's close ones like that which may help us be able to get to the bottom of this .
It comes down to that space thing again .

If you're really there first , then you should be able to take it , but if you know that there's car car in close proximity you should leave yourself enough grip to at least be able to give the other guy room if he gets there with you .
If you slide through on the attempt , like Dan did at first , when he was fully inside , then it's fair game .

But , on the exit , it was Nico who misjudged how close Dan was , and moved into his path too early .

It's that space thing . You need to leave enough . It's what they told Kimi .


Sorry for arguing the point again .
We need not agree .
No need to apologise, all good. I guess it comes down to this point, is a driver entitled in a situation like that to cut across another driver? To me, I think yes they should be able to as they should be entitled to do anything which should not end up in contact to defend their position. In this case, I feel Rosberg had the racing line, he took it and at the time he took it, there was really no way he could have known it would end up in contact. Danny was coming from off the racing line onto it. In that situation, where the driver has the racing line, if an incident occurs, I think fault should like with the driver coming back onto the racing line. I can see your viewpoint however, and it's really a matter of what stance you take. Maybe both are valid points and, if that's the case, it's just a racing incident.