Results 1 to 10 of 1185
Thread: WRC mainclass from 2027
Threaded View
-
10th December 2025, 21:41 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2021
- Posts
- 1,762
- Like
- 745
- Liked 800 Times in 458 Posts
Why not? Group A is gone. Reference cars are gone (bespoke styles permitted). All M-Sport need is a production engine. I don't know if the volume was made public or not, but given M-Sport provide engines to another series - they should be OK I think. Besides in August, FIA said manufacturers with another requirement are welcome to explain it.

Inside the sport, yes same level, and it makes sense:
Outside the sport and from a road-legal POV, it makes no sense still:
Originally Posted by FIA
I read this as 'manufacturer' supplies a 'tuner':
Originally Posted by FIA
As I understand these things from my own experience and understanding of what will happen, a 'bodywork tuner car' will still legally be a 'manufacturer car'. Because if the 'manufacturer' sells a rolling chassis without paperwork (which it wouldn't), the 'bodywork tuner' is de facto the 'manufacturer' upon registration under their own name. So, a bodywork tuner will be driving an identical car on paper, only it looks different. (Kind of like how a Vauxhall Astra can be an estate or hatchback - it's a poor analogy). Last time out, the FIA said tuners will have to align with the manufacturer for all parts, so this makes sense to itself.
Originally Posted by FIA
But upon FIA homologation, it looks like what is a legal 'manufacturer car' will become a 'tuner car' within FIA walls because the tuner homologated it.
They could do with getting somebody who wrote the rules to explain it rather than passing post it notes to the press office to interpret.



Reply With Quote
I can't think of a better way of doing it for the rally, but it could halve the championship points.
[WRC] Safari Rally Kenya 2026