All this talk about what should be the future top class cars in WRC all stems from the change to the "WRC+" cars in 2017. This then lead on to the Rally1 hybrids from 2022.
In hindsight, both seem to have been a mistake. Very spectacular looking and super-fast, but too expensive and complicated for new manufacturers and private drivers.
The talk of WRC2+ cars for the future makes me think of the 2011-16 WRC cars. These were really all that was needed with enough power, tech and aero to be exciting but also more affordable.
Was there really anything wrong with this sort of action...
Eddie, you can't judge from your fan's point of view. It's not the decisive one. The world is different than in 2011 and what worked for the manufacturers in that time makes no sense for them now.
Answer: NO
WRC Regulations
17.1.1 Each Manufacturer must use no more than 2 engines per car
name per season (see also Art.17.2.2 and Art. 17.2.3).
But
17.2.3 When a car does not finish...
Where do you set the limit?
Do you allow a new engine and a new gearbox on every day of every event?
Using your figures that would be €1.5 million in engines and gearboxes every event!
The WRC has some stupid rules.
The manufacturers spent 60 miilions a year or more to win titles, and then they limite engines to only two?
A third one would blow the budgets? Seriously?
...
Aren't engines linked with certain chassis numbers?
Rally Chile Biobio 2025