Results 1 to 10 of 29

Threaded View

  1. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Greenwich, London UK
    Posts
    3,721
    Like
    21
    Liked 829 Times in 686 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by airshifter View Post
    As with any major shaking up, it's uncertain how it will be received by either the teams or the fans really. Until things actually happen, all we can do is speculate. But I think if they want to maintain a strong audience then the rules changes will have to be more inline with clarifications and minor details that keep another double decker diffuser situation from happening.

    As for the tracks, I won't be surprised if the audiences start declining quicker. Even with all the "side show" entertainment, it seems a lot of the younger generation just don't want to spend as much time at outdoor events. But we already see tracks where attendance is low, and the revenues from TV and streaming viewing are overcoming those shortages.

    As for the DNA aspect... as I've said before IMHO it's been changing ever since the teams started really innovating. Going back to ground effect cars is a good thing really, but this time everyone is going to have it.
    I can't argue with most of what you say really. But l have a feeling that Brawn was not talking about clarifications and minor details. That is how it works currently, hence would be no change otherwise. I suspect he was talking about substantive alteration of the regulations where they deem it necessary.

    On the DNA front, competitive innovation is in the heart of the F1 DNA.
    Last edited by Nitrodaze; 9th January 2020 at 16:23.
    Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
    William Shakespeare

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •