Page 71 of 439 FirstFirst ... 2161697071727381121171 ... LastLast
Results 701 to 710 of 4386
  1. #701
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Halifax, UK
    Posts
    531
    Like
    169
    Liked 140 Times in 86 Posts
    I don't mind the current regs or the R5s but the problem with them is there isn't enough disparity with the body styles. Almost all S2000-based rally cars and the R5s are 3 door superminis. The only exceptions I can think of are the Fabia S2000, a 5 door supermini and the Toyota Corolla & Auris S2000s - 5 door compact (or whatever one size up from supermini is) hatchbacks. If I have forgotten any please chime in

    I don't know if there is any way regulations could successfully encourage use of more body styles but surely increasing minimum size would help as otherwise the manufacturers are limited pretty much to only using superminis.

    In an ideal dream-world I'd have something like 2011 WRC but with similar measures to cut cost as R5 but the body style open to 'prototypes'. By that I mean Ford may enter the championship with something looking very Ford-like but they can sex-up the body shape instead of making it look like a Fiesta. Toyota could make a car looking distinctly Toyota-ish with a 3 door coupe body and call it, for example, 'Celica GT-Four' even though the road car doesn't exist.

    The cars would be interesting to the fans because they're not limited to whatever boring crap the manufacturer sells but they'd have the VW, Ford, Citroen, Hyundai, Toyota etc. 'family face'. It's like Group-B for modern times. I personally hate mentioning Group-B because it's silly to live in the past, but I think having a 'prototype' rally car is a fairly simple (please prove me wrong ) way of making spectacular looking rally cars - without resorting to £250,000 homologation specials with too much power to be safely hurtling through a forest or alpine road with and fuel tanks mounted under the occupants and magnesium everywhere to light up in a ball of flames!

    Dream world I know but that's just my two-pennies worth!

  2. #702
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,961
    Like
    0
    Liked 65 Times in 28 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by sollitt View Post
    Absolute nonsense. A formula like Grp4 or Grp A is simply that ... a formula. It can be applied/adapted to fit any era.
    There is no reason why the sport could not adopt a specification that is affordable and accessible to domestic competitors and in which they can then step up on to the world stage and be competitive.
    GrpN, in it's day, could have provided the platform but they wouldn't have been spectacular enough. S2000 & R5 are certainly spectacular enough and manufacturers are producing the hardware. The cars are affordable to buy but are they too costly to run? Something in between?

    Rallyper is exactly right. It's not for manufacturers to come and change the sport to suit themselves. They need to apply themselves to the nature of the sport.
    S2000/R5 affordable? Depends on your definition of affordable I suppose... Without the need for homologations and homologated parts, cars of equal performance would be much much cheaper...

  3. #703
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    East Devon
    Posts
    3,569
    Like
    313
    Liked 106 Times in 60 Posts
    Just putting this out there so don't flame me but....

    As costs are such an issue what about adding in many standard parts or maybe even a silhouette formula, even if just for the next few years?

    Discuss..

  4. #704
    친애하는 지도자
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Posts
    20,522
    Like
    439
    Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
    no

    end of discussion

  5. #705
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,961
    Like
    0
    Liked 65 Times in 28 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyRAC View Post
    Blimey, DR had changed his tune. Being outside of the WRC has made him realise what is wrong with it. He actually said a lot of those things in January at the Autosport Show.
    Live TV is old news, it's all about streaming on the internet.
    TV aims for the general masses, internet only aims for the current fans. Its the age old question, should I want 1 euro from one hundred people or 100 euro from a single person?

    And I actually agree about the cars; who honestly aspires to own a DS3, i20, Polo R....When I win the lottery, I won't be rushing to buy one of them, albeit they're nice, solid, reliable cars.

    Is anybody brave enough to suggest turning their back on the hot hatch/ family runabout? And going for something more spectacular? I don't think they are. More of the same I expect.....
    Well lets be fair, who ever aspired to own a Peugeot 205 or Mini Cooper or Ford Focus? Yet they are supposedly all classic rallycars. In my opinion rallycars have always been beefed up versions of common streetcars. Rallycars that became streetcars like the Mitsubishi Lancer Subaru Impreza or Lancia Stratos have been the exception to that rule, not the norm.

  6. #706
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Athens
    Posts
    25,187
    Like
    10,147
    Liked 16,147 Times in 7,018 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by N.O.T View Post
    no

    end of discussion
    look your inbox Greg.

  7. #707
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,748
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Lousada View Post
    S2000/R5 affordable? Depends on your definition of affordable I suppose... Without the need for homologations and homologated parts, cars of equal performance would be much much cheaper...
    I specifically asked FIA technical steward about this point. The answer was that they don't want to allow free supply of parts because of a) safety concerns and b) to protect business of those who homologate the parts. Take it as You like...
    Last edited by Mirek; 21st May 2014 at 19:28.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  8. #708
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,961
    Like
    0
    Liked 65 Times in 28 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Allyc85 View Post
    Just putting this out there so don't flame me but....

    As costs are such an issue what about adding in many standard parts or maybe even a silhouette formula, even if just for the next few years?

    Discuss..
    Motorsport is about the cars first and second. Look into a Fiesta R5 once and you have seen them all. And you have seen them all for the next few years because the development on R5's is minimal. And then we wonder why people are gradually losing interest?

  9. #709
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,961
    Like
    0
    Liked 65 Times in 28 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    I specifically asked FIA technical steward about this point. The answer was that they don't want to allow free supply of parts because of a) safety concerns and b) to protect business of those who homologate the parts. Take it as You like...
    Well... at least they were honest to you about the real reason (the second)...

  10. #710
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    107
    Like
    0
    Liked 68 Times in 23 Posts
    Maybe the best solution would have been to ban 4wd immediately when Quattro came, like they did in Formula 1 with Lotus...

    It’s a little bit funny, but very popular national series are driven with old school technology, 2WD non-turbo cars. NASCAR is good example for the reason, that when the product is good, all the manufacturers want to be there.

    My point is: When lot of people are interested about the product, the media and the money will be there also. And when there is lot of people, media and money, the manufacturers will be there also, for sure.

    Media only can’t save the current situation. Capito’s idea won’t definitely save the current situation. Artificial respiration will keep the patient alive for a moment, but without big change we will loose our beloved sport like we remember it.

    No need to change the original nature of the sport. But many people want to see, hear and smell something different comparing to their ordinary day.
    Why can’t WorldRallyCar be 800-900kg, tube frame, RWD, non-turbo, max 3.0 litre engine with 10000rpm rev limiter and sequential gearbox silhouette car? Could be build by anyone, no mandatory to be an official car manufacturer.

    Would you like to watch that kind of WRC cars?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •