Results 1,461 to 1,470 of 1470
Thread: WRC mainclass from 2027
-
Today, 10:45 #1461Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2026
- Posts
- 56
- Like
- 38
- Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I have a really hard time to be objective around next years rules to be honest, since I am a WRC17 super-fan. Hope it turns out well, but I expect it will be a hard sell for new fans. Old fans will stay more or less no matter what
-
Today, 11:11 #1462Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2024
- Posts
- 910
- Like
- 259
- Liked 231 Times in 160 Posts
its going to be fine, fellas.
ask the ERC fans here. its totally ok, no joke.
cars may be slower but you get over it once theres other stories to pay attention - and there will be.
its like when f1 change stuff. people go crazy and talk & complain for months but then the focus shift to whats happening in the championship. its not a dramatic change like "we are going Evs, theres only 7 cars, 6 rounds and nobody can watch it"
- Likes: Ferranis (Today)
-
Today, 11:30 #1463Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2026
- Posts
- 56
- Like
- 38
- Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Let's just hope that there are not that many people that think like me. High powered cars are a major part of WRC excitement for me and when I look in the past: Group B is so much loved for a reason.
But be it as it may: Currently there is no alternative anyway. WRC got devalued by the promoter / fia that much, that this is the only way forward
-
Today, 11:57 #1464Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Location
- England
- Posts
- 21,826
- Like
- 3,733
- Liked 10,249 Times in 5,572 Posts
It will never be a big a change as 1987 was, with the switch to Gp A after the Gp B monsters. Plus they were banned for safety, not changed because they needed more Manufacturers!
Look at the Monte Carlo entry list for the cars we had to 'enjoy' ...
https://ewrc-results.com/event/1576-...o-1987/entries
- Likes: Ferranis (Today)
-
Today, 14:36 #1465Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2017
- Posts
- 896
- Like
- 181
- Liked 795 Times in 379 Posts
-
Today, 15:08 #1466
-
Today, 16:45 #1467Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2021
- Posts
- 1,869
- Like
- 777
- Liked 828 Times in 478 Posts
Wrong. There's only engine and powertrain in common. IF there's a flush new promoter than they could announce a RC2+ tune up in performance immediately for Rally1, and possibly full step up coming in a few years. In safety the chasses and cells are designed for a higher performance.
This level was set to immediately get more competition and as a back stop for life without a flush promoter.
- Likes: Ferranis (Today)
-
Today, 16:56 #1468Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2026
- Posts
- 56
- Like
- 38
- Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
I expect (hope) that this will be the case. That we only have to suffer a year or two and then the new promoter ups the performance
- Likes: WRCStan (Today)
-
Today, 17:01 #1469Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2021
- Posts
- 1,869
- Like
- 777
- Liked 828 Times in 478 Posts
^ Agree.
Brand new cars to last for decades and the Rally2 or Rally2 sourced - whatever it is - engine is not the long term sole solution.
- Likes: Ferranis (Today)
-
Today, 17:14 #1470Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2026
- Posts
- 56
- Like
- 38
- Liked 11 Times in 10 Posts
They wanted to open the power train anyway with hybrid / electric. Hope its power too they want to increase at some point.
Now the crucial part is actually retaining the new teams (tuners), allowing them to grow to make this financially viable


Reply With Quote

It's a shame, because he is a good driver. When I did some calculations when Hyundai choosing the driver after Tanak left, he was results wise one of the best to pick.
WRC2 news & rumors 2026