Thread: WRC mainclass from 2027
-
Today, 09:36 #1381Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2026
- Posts
- 30
- Like
- 9
- Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Off topic, but I am a firm believer that Hyundai is a top team (maybe not this year, but still), that was massively let down by its drivers.
Put Ogier / Tanak in the Team from 2017 onward and we would look at a dominating team with many constructor and individual championchips
-
Today, 18:33 #1382Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2018
- Location
- Milkyway -> Earth -> Europe -> Slovenia
- Posts
- 1,545
- Like
- 125
- Liked 575 Times in 338 Posts
Tanak was there twice, did you forget that? And koining Toyota team for testing and not Hyubndai, is quite clear it's the cars that let him down again and again. In that team there were so much great drivers and still they struggle year by year. We saw that if great drivers are put in M-Sport they can do miracles, which sadly can't be said for Hyundai. Based on results Hyundai did best when there was Adamo pulling the strings. I strongly believe that Neuville won the title simply because Ogier did too many mistakes. If he would drive like last year he would easily won that too. I blame Cyril to turn that team to worse, simply because he is not the right man for this sport. After so much years they could at least be somewhere, but they getting nowhere. If they continue like that in WEC where competition is way higher, intense I don't know how they will ever achieve great things. They've had so much chances through all those years in WRC when there was only 2-3 teams to compete.
- Likes: Eli (Today),Ferranis (Today)
-
Today, 18:48 #1383Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2026
- Posts
- 30
- Like
- 9
- Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
-
Today, 19:05 #1384Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 2,325
- Like
- 612
- Liked 1,042 Times in 510 Posts
What? The hybrid i20 in 2022 and 2023 was one of the most unreliable rally cars ever made, not even prime Loeb could have won the title with a car whose suspensions would fall apart on road sections. Only in 2024 it was close to Toyota, and in fact Neuville won the title. The hybridless + Hankook i20 in 2025 and 2026 is close to undriveable and much slower than Toyota more often than not.
Tanak drove for Hyundai for 5 seasons, couldn't clinch the title and was fed up with the car's being slower and more unreliable than Toyota. Ogier couldn't handle the C3 having 2 powersteering failures in a whole season as sole reliability problems, let alone the Hyundai.
- Likes: Ferranis (Today)
-
Today, 22:07 #1385Senior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2014
- Location
- Estonia
- Posts
- 15,620
- Like
- 7,005
- Liked 12,784 Times in 5,575 Posts
Ferranis has a different point
He means if Ogier and Tänak would have been there prior 2017 and developed the cars not jumping into those wrongly developed ones.
-
Today, 22:30 #1386Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 2,325
- Like
- 612
- Liked 1,042 Times in 510 Posts
You can have a case about driveability, but it's still up to engineers to develop the car according to the driver input. It's Ogier and Tanak would have been better at developing than Thierry, but would the engineers be able to transform their input into a good car? Neuville didn't ask for an understeering car, nobody would, in the past he had to modify his driving style and use handbrake a lot to counterbalance how the car naturally was.
For reliability and parts that just fail, that's totally up to the team.



Reply With Quote
Ferranis has a different point He means if Ogier and Tänak would have been there prior 2017 and developed the cars not jumping into those wrongly developed ones.
WRC mainclass from 2027