In my original list Sainz was fourth, and I think he deserves to be ahead of Mäkinen although the title numbers suggest otherwise. Remember RAC 1998, had things gone a bit differently, titles could be 3-3 between the two, and in that case Sainz would be clearly better in terms of other achievements.
I agree, the top 5 is not in dispute really. I suppose you could say that Kankkunen is an odd one because he never won on tarmac, so all his success came from loose surface rallies.
I dont agree. If FIA and promoter works properly and has anything to offer, I am sure we should have 3-4 manufacturers (which is enough for proper championship)...
Mismanagement? They were bound to the decrees of Politicians and the Princes of Finance.
17-19 was class because of 4 teams all equally capable with a spread of talent. Wouldn't see that again...
Right now yes, but this is after years of mis-management, which could not have happened :( (one can dream)
17 we were on a high, which was squandered later on, especially with the ill fated...
To go back to the original topic after a really fun excursion (thank you all for the wonderful discussion).
THIS is what I want the top class of WRC to be and not whatever WRC27 will be.
With...
I dont agree. If FIA and promoter works properly and has anything to offer, I am sure we should have 3-4 manufacturers (which is enough for proper championship)...
WRC mainclass from 2027