Results 1 to 10 of 503
Thread: Silly Season 2022
Threaded View
-
14th October 2021, 09:03 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 6,016
- Like
- 344
- Liked 3,911 Times in 2,041 Posts
“We know how important having a good co-driver alongside me is,” said Greensmith.
Well this could have come out wrong, but I doubt Greensmiths issues with Elliot were cause Elliot was "bad" co-driver, given the recent record with Mikkelsen.
It was more that he (Greensmith) needed some co-driver to steer him.
Undoubtedly there has been some improvement, but as said before I disagree that it "has shown that Greesmith deservers to drive WRC" on speed/performance alone.
--------
I disagree, what you mention are details that might have made Toyota win anyway, yet they did not even though the were 1-2 in drivers. In way it was Tanaks and Neuvilles issues that almost lost title for Hyundai. (also remember mexico with issues for all 3 cars 2x technical,1 crash). Also remember that Evans had much better results than basically anyone expected before the season.
In direct comparison Rovanpera was supposed to outscore Sordo+Breen+Loeb on their chosen rallies with road position advantage, in his first WRC season. That was entirely impossible.
In the end Rovanpera got just 27 manu points!
Sordo+Breen+Loeb got 81 !!!
Rovanpera did great for first season, but he didn't have a chance beforehand.
----
But I find it amusing that people (even WRC journalists) compare Solberg and Rovanpera a year ago. It's like a completely different sport.
As AnttiL wrote on twitter Rovanpera had some 3500? more stage kms in R5 before going to WRC... and a WRC2 title.... and lots of wins.
Rovanpera has had the fastest driver development curve in (recent?) history... and then Hyundai tries to develop Solberg twice as fast.Last edited by mknight; 14th October 2021 at 09:07.
- Likes: Corcaíoch (14th October 2021)



Reply With Quote
https://www.subaru.co.jp/en/alliance/
WRC mainclass from 2027