Quote Originally Posted by Nitrodaze View Post
I think we have said enough on the subject. As l pointed out, there are two very strong views on the matter. And they appear irreconcilable. The very attempt to discuss the matter is very uncomfortable to many. Some see it as an accusation of being racists. Which you would not find in my post either. Though l have suggested that some are overly critical of Hamilton. But not equally so when other drivers do the same thing.

If it was Hamilton that caused the pileup at the start of the Hungarian GP, these individuals would have plenty to say about it. Their post would be laced with venom. As it was Bottas, it was a non-event. Nor was the crash of Stroll into the side of the Ferrari. Not a single peep about it. But you all had plenty to say about a racing incident that was just as innocent as those two Hungarian incidents, because the Silverstone incident involved Hamilton. The Hungarian damage was just as bad; actually worst. Perez was just as much in danger of being killed in that crash. The cost is not dissimilar. Redbull is probably still going to pay the £1.3m cost of repairing that car as well, and more for Verstappen's car.

I think you all should stop for a moment and examine your selves. Your acts and statements are analysed in detail and we call your actions as we see them. You may find my observations uncomfortable. Take that as a clue that you need to take a reflective look at yourselves.
Essentially that was my point and I got no response except for some vitriolic off topic responses about perceived perceptions about their nature.
As i said, i wonder why there have not been 20 pages about the bottas incident or stroll. Not a single word, nothing.
The strongest criticisms came from me and a few others who are deemed "fan boys" or biased. laughable
The guy took out both Red Bulls and a Mclaren as well as damaging the other Mclaren and Stroll took out the Ferrari and nearly the Alpha Tauri.
But zero discussion on that? All those "if it were somebody else, I'd be making the same criticism" folks had nothing to say.
Many didn't even bother coming back to the forum to have their say. So this is about as clear evidence as any about the actual bias.
And as usual the last resort is to accuse those pointing out the imbalance as the actual ones biased. Etc.
Yeah, that's why I don't waste my time trying to get into those arguments with them.

That say's it all to me