Quote Originally Posted by meh View Post
Dirtfish have nice gap to fill - official channel need to provide neutral facts but they can provide opinions, they can publish rumors, they can make interviews the way like they want and provide content which is not doable by wrc.com.
Do note that DirtFish do make commercial co-operation with several drivers and events, in other words those drivers and events pay DirtFish to produce and publish content about them. It can create a bit of a weird situation when they co-operate with one but not with the other and especially if there is something negative to report about. DirtFish is OK as long as you know how to read them. The worst thing DirtFish did was pretty killing all rallying content from Autosport - and I'm silly enough to believe Autosport works or worked more independently.

The job of wrc.com is just to create content to support the championship. It's fully open commercial operation. It still could be better, way better, but in a way, at least myself, I don't expect anything from them.