Results 1 to 10 of 1435

Threaded View

  1. 2nd February 2020, 19:15 #11
    BleAivano
    BleAivano is offline
    Senior Member BleAivano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,100
    Like
    451
    Liked 327 Times in 188 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tommeke_B View Post
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE8SD3upCwM

    Back in 2000 it seems like they drove in conditions that were far from ideal as well... Maybe taking the risk to destroy the roads is the most interesting option at this point. Could be better than refunding spectators, entrants,
    disappointed sponsors etc, and putting an end to Rally Sweden...
    I can see both sides of it. On one side I agree with what you say that sponsors/TV-companies, teams, specators can't be let down and etc. However if you look upon it from the other side, if the roads gets too damaged
    the likely hood of being allowed to used those roads next year will become slimmer (even if the rally pays for restoration of the roads). That said I really don't see them cancelling. Step 1 is to cancel the stages that are in
    the worst condition and then if needed and if possible a stage could be rerun once on another day just to get the necessary KM. Step 2 would be to cancel the historic class either completely or on some stages.
    Last edited by BleAivano; 2nd February 2020 at 19:19.
    ...Funny how ev'rything was roses when we held on to the guns...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. Likes: tommeke_B (2nd February 2020)
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules