Rally Mexico 2018

**focus206** · 18th March 2018, 14:54

Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC

If everyone is happy that Tanak and Neuville did the right thing in Mexico PS then I give up.

Fairness and justification obviously mean nothing.

Yes, give up. There's nothing fair in being a blind fan who tries to scrap every little excuse to give advantage to his favourite team and drivers. The fact that you don't even realize your huge double standards (M-Sport and british drivers vs everything and everyone else) is worrying.

**Fast Eddie WRC** · 18th March 2018, 15:42

What is so ironic is that none of you understand that M-Sport were only looking for some fairness in Sweden after the joke snow sweeping (and Historics) preventing any chance of points.

In Mexico there was no PS justification for Toyota or Hyundai as Tanak and Neuville lost time due to car unreliability.

My argument is NOT bias... its about fairness.

**Tarmop** · 18th March 2018, 15:54

What is ironic is that you still can`t take your fan-glasses off. There were many, who had disadvantages from their start position, including Tänak and Latvala. Both started where they were supposed to, having one car less in front of them (Ogier) AND M-Sport continued it by letting Evans get even a bigger fine to give Ogier 1(!) point. They didn`t like that at the time. Now all the teams say, that it is OK and in the end the one who collects more points wins. So...STFU please, this is getting too old and tiresome.

**N.O.T** · 18th March 2018, 16:05

can we please let this thread die a horrible death ? arguing with a triggered mentally challenged person is not good for anyone.

**EightGear** · 18th March 2018, 16:08

Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC

What is so ironic is that none of you understand that M-Sport were only looking for some fairness in Sweden after the joke snow sweeping (and Historics) preventing any chance of points.

In Mexico there was no PS justification for Toyota or Hyundai as Tanak and Neuville lost time due to car unreliability.

My argument is NOT bias... its about fairness.

'Fairness' my ***. This is a cut-throat top level competition with large stakes.

If the rules allow it, teams and drivers will take any opportunity to gain the slightest advantage.

**AL14** · 18th March 2018, 16:21

Yes just let this go, it's becoming embarassing even just reading it.

**focus206** · 18th March 2018, 16:30

Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC

My argument is NOT bias... its about fairness.

And who judges when it's fair or not? Fair is when rules are the same for everybody, not "oh boo-hoo, poor Ogier/M-Sport/british driver, he was unlucky with weather conditions, we'll make an exception for him". Tough luck, this is the World Rally Championship, not the Kindergarten Rally Championship.

**er88** · 18th March 2018, 16:58

Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC

My argument is NOT bias... its about fairness.

Yeah, sure....

Until the rules are re-written it doesn't matter what YOU think is fair. Tanak and Neuville took advantage of the loophole, just like Seb and Msport did. The rules allow it so other drivers will do it too, until the FIA do something about it.

**N.O.T** · 18th March 2018, 17:36

Originally Posted by er88

Yeah, sure....

Until the rules are re-written it doesn't matter what YOU think is fair. Tanak and Neuville took advantage of the loophole, just like Seb and Msport did. The rules allow it so other drivers will do it too, until the FIA do something about it.

you cannot go full retard when you are already a full retard man...

this thread is going to end all of us in jail for hate speech against the disabled...