Results 1 to 10 of 520
Threaded View
-
8th September 2017, 18:00 #11Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,746
- Like
- 7,917
- Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
IMO the advantage of keeping the camber is more of an advantage in off road races where there is a need of good traction even with rather extreme positions of wheels. On the other hand these cars have usually huge wheels so they don't need to care about small bumps/holes unlike WRC cars with rather small diameter of wheels. Those huge wheels are also heavy so the weight of suspension alone doesn't play that big role.
Double wishbone shall be better for heavy braking as well and as it was already said it's more robust and can take more beating.
IMO there is another advantage of double wishbone and that's freedom of setting the castor. With usual McPherson setup there are massive forces in the steering coming from huge castor (angled strut) and with that more reliability problems appear.
Take is as an amateur talk anyway
Last edited by Mirek; 8th September 2017 at 18:03.
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump


Reply With Quote
The Chinese Grand Prix has shown that Mercedes has a huge advantage over the rest of the field. And that advantage is in pure engine power supremacy. At a depleted battery, the Mercedes has...
Is the 2026 Regulation going to...