Results 4,471 to 4,480 of 7660
Thread: Rally2 (ex-R5) News
-
10th April 2017, 18:19 #4471Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- Zlin
- Posts
- 8,961
- Like
- 567
- Liked 4,209 Times in 1,911 Posts
I still think that biggest mistake of Emil was that he was going to WRC2 too quickly. And from beginning he wanted to fight for best places with factory drivers... He should stay one year in ERC with R5 car to know the car well...
- Likes: dimviii (10th April 2017),marcosg (1st May 2017),nafpaktos (10th April 2017),Sulland (10th April 2017),WUff1 (10th April 2017)
-
10th April 2017, 20:24 #4472Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Östhammar, Sweden
- Posts
- 8,981
- Like
- 6,259
- Liked 3,058 Times in 1,749 Posts
To me it´s also about economy. Bergkvist had to take what they could afford. And the Citroen wasn´t, and isn´t the best car. The Citroen is way from the pace reliability compared to Skoda and Fiesta.
I have seen him driving 4WD cars in sweden and don´t think that´s the problem.
If you don´t drive many rallies and on top of all, when you do your seldom apparencies you have more on your shoulders than just driving fast.
That combination to me, could be an explanation. However he´s done mistakes as well, so at the time being I´m quite mixed up with the feelings for Emil. Should want him the best, but that hasn´t been seen for long now."Reis vas pät pat kaar vas kut"
Tommi Mäkinen, back in the years...
- Likes: pantealex (11th April 2017)
-
12th April 2017, 09:24 #4473
R5 with paddleshift in 2018? Costs will increase. Stupid guys will damage the best car rules in years.
- Likes: Arnold Triyudho Wardono (12th April 2017),eddy707 (12th April 2017),leighton323 (12th April 2017),Sulland (15th May 2017)
-
12th April 2017, 09:30 #4474Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
- Europe
- Posts
- 1,135
- Like
- 318
- Liked 1,176 Times in 389 Posts
Yes, MSport was testing it already mid last year.
I think FIA will tell that WRC cars become more advanced, so they need to make R5 more advanced also, etc. And main reason is to make R5 more expensive to make room for new R4, as currently it won't be much cheaper than R5...
- Likes: dimviii (12th April 2017)
-
12th April 2017, 11:07 #4475Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- Zlin
- Posts
- 8,961
- Like
- 567
- Liked 4,209 Times in 1,911 Posts
Another stupid decision made by FIA. Like usually...
- Likes: Andre Oliveira (12th April 2017),eddy707 (12th April 2017),electroliquid (12th April 2017),Fly (12th April 2017),leighton323 (12th April 2017),Micke_VOC (27th April 2017),TWRC (12th April 2017)
-
12th April 2017, 15:07 #4476Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,909
- Like
- 2,178
- Liked 2,265 Times in 1,217 Posts
Does paddleshift even make the cars quicker or just easier to drive?
What other changes are coming to R5?
-
12th April 2017, 15:15 #4477
Restrictor size will change too
-
12th April 2017, 15:32 #4478Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,909
- Like
- 2,178
- Liked 2,265 Times in 1,217 Posts
-
12th April 2017, 15:45 #4479Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2002
- Posts
- 389
- Like
- 198
- Liked 161 Times in 79 Posts
-
12th April 2017, 16:45 #4480Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,909
- Like
- 2,178
- Liked 2,265 Times in 1,217 Posts
I understand the need for faster R5 cars in order to reduce the gap to the new WRCars, but perhaps it would have been better to not increase the speed of those too.



Reply With Quote

The difference is crazy. When the Hyundai is off pace, its not like, 0.1 sec a kilometer, its a second / seconds a kilometer
[WRC] Forum8 Rally Japan 2026