Results 431 to 440 of 2630
-
30th January 2017, 12:07 #431
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- lillehammer
- Posts
- 1,587
- Like
- 1,721
- Liked 838 Times in 404 Posts
If Mikkelsen has know about VW exit before, he probably had a seat this year. With or without some sort of backing. If ogier had refused M-sport, Mikkelsen would been driving ogiers car.
Sent fra min XP7700 via TapatalkRadioreporter @ www.radiomotor.no
KNA Lillehammer Motorsport
-
30th January 2017, 12:07 #432
Is it common for driver's contract to have clause that require mandatory minimal performance, and if not met, contract to be terminated?
-
30th January 2017, 12:12 #433
-
30th January 2017, 12:12 #434
- Join Date
- Aug 2000
- Posts
- 20,522
- Like
- 439
- Liked 2,720 Times in 1,256 Posts
-
30th January 2017, 12:19 #435
-
30th January 2017, 12:54 #436
I don't agree. Privateer trophy have no reason to exist with official WRC cars imho. They're using the same car as the championship and there is already a trophy for it: the world championship. If they want they can win it. With 2016 cars is ok but not with new ones.
There is no reason to find more than one winner like in the kindergarten.
- Likes: WRC1 (30th January 2017)
-
30th January 2017, 13:19 #437
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Biri, Norway
- Posts
- 4,844
- Like
- 126
- Liked 1,924 Times in 757 Posts
"Die with memories, not with dreams" Scott McIsaac
http://www.motorsportfilmer.net
-
30th January 2017, 14:12 #438
So Serderidis last and first in Monte Carlo is better? Privateers do a sacrifice to be there and no media attention. Not a championship, a trophy to they.
-
30th January 2017, 14:13 #439
-
30th January 2017, 14:20 #440
I think that M-Sport would do just fine if not the best, if there would be no manufacturer direct involvement. As mentioned. Manufacturer would provide a car, tuner would build the racing beast, and...
WRC mainclass from 2027