Quote Originally Posted by itix View Post
David Evans blurbinbg his bollocks again...

Drawing conclusions from 1 very specialized rally and from spectating one corner *sigh*.

Also, the man writes as vaguely as he can about everything except the hard facts (Citroen had a shit weekend), probably to cater for the possibility that he's totally wrong and the Citroen is fast after all, just not on that particular rally.

Why does he still have a job? Oh yeah right, because everyone reading Autosport only really care about F1.


And what exactly is not correct in David's story? Come on, he is writing for Autosport, not Racecar Engineering. He's explaining with the help of one corner what could be seen on a thousands corners more.

And it's not his fault, that the majority of Autosport reader's - of every general motorsport magazine worldwide that is - are F1 fans and care about Rallying only on the side.

At least he is one of the few journalist's who still takes the time to watch stages.