Results 1 to 10 of 520
Threaded View
-
30th December 2016, 17:00 #11
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,836
- Like
- 1,479
- Liked 1,844 Times in 717 Posts
I agree, as an analysis it's utter crap, too bad it's presented as such. As a general explanation and introduction to a layman about the new WRC cars it has some merit, as it compares the road car with the rally car. If they had such a thing for all components (suspension, engine, tyres etc.) it would be a nice resource to show casual fans. But as an analysis it's useless because it compares the WRC to a road car (irrelevant) instead of comparing the different approaches and interpretations of a well defined rule set between each other.
Check this out: http://www.mulsannescorner.com/RCELeMans2016.html
That's how you do aero analysis.
- Likes: A FONDO (30th December 2016),AndyRAC (1st January 2017)
My understanding is that the car number 1 is always the car number one on the events, no matter the chassis. The chassis used in Sweden by Tanak is not the same used in Chile, tthe plate number is...
Rally Chile Biobio 2025