Quote Originally Posted by Eli View Post
http://www.autosport.com/news/report...calendar-slots 13!!! Rotation system, here we go again...
Autosport text it’s quite close with last week Motorsport Monday article. But it misses one crucial point: the promoter said to MM that their rotation plan it’s based on a 3 years on 3 years off system, in order to ensure that new events would get an easier financial planning.

It’s hard to believe that rotation is the way to develop WRC, as the previous experiences have shown (based in one year leaves), but this eventual 3 year cycle seems the right way to destroy it!

In a 14 events calendar like the one we got, there’s room for some improving rearrangements (with NZ comeback on top of the list), and none of the current events should be forever granted if organizers flaws became evident, but this new rotation scheme seems more a fast way to get money than an honest answer to fix WRC media coverage problem.