I have (in the past) and will continue to side with NOT in this one. In my mind, building a car is not what is being debated. That's been done and that isn't the hard part, the AP4 cars being built in NZ illustrate that modifying a body shell, adapting it to use motorsport parts, adding and engine and gearbox and building suspension can be done by a lot of competent motorsport orientated car builders.

Where I think this program just doesn't feel right is the Tommi "knows best" approach. Seeing him test drive the car didn't make me think, here is a guy who trusts his team to do the right thing and is positioning it with a well thought out business plan and strategy, it made me think "he still wants to be a driver in the WRC". I just don't get the sense that there is a complete strategy in place for this. I've said it before, the WRC isn't just about building a car, its the support functions and the entire team that will make it successful - still don't get the sense that that is in place.

Is there any information out there on the team itself?

And please guys, NOT is NOT. Don't troll him, no point it just makes the thread a more unpleasant one.