Page 347 of 439 FirstFirst ... 247297337345346347348349357397 ... LastLast
Results 3,461 to 3,470 of 4386
  1. #3461
    Objective observer stefanvv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wonderlamd
    Posts
    6,715
    Like
    1,558
    Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rayh_mx View Post
    Don't be sorry, it's important that you try

    In fact "Vamos Vocho". Something similar like "C'mon Beetle"

    Vocho is the popular term for adapted VW beetle air cold
    Ah, yes. I forgot something from Spanish obviously. Thank You.
    "With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI

  2. Likes: rayh_mx (23rd September 2015)
  3. #3462
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mariusz View Post
    What do you think, is it possible to cheat in a similar way in WRC cars? You know, temporary decrease the performance to the allowed limits when being tested but let the car go in full power on stages?

    In both real world and rally who tests? In USA the emissions testing is what is called "self certification" which as explained to me by the Certification Engineer at Saab years ago means they send in data to US EPA and say "It does this" and that's it. Since I run a business that specialized in the Ford "Taunus" V4 which Saab used (1,5 liter for all markets from '67 thru 1980 except USA for 71 thru end or 73 when we got the "Big Block" 1,7 liter...) I asked about the use of 1,7 for the last 3 years of importation "what did you do about emissions" (the 1500 V4 was 90mm bore, and 58.6mm stroke and 9:1 compression, the 1700 was 90mm bore, same rods and 66.8 stroke and 8.0 compression...but same cam, same everything else)
    In short similar stuff but really quite different, so I asked. He said "Oh we knew we're just schedule to sell those for 2-3 more years so we just sent in the same data as before..It is self certifying so why bother"
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  4. #3463
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Indonesia
    Posts
    203
    Like
    82
    Liked 124 Times in 64 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mariusz View Post
    What do you think, is it possible to cheat in a similar way in WRC cars? You know, temporary decrease the performance to the allowed limits when being tested but let the car go in full power on stages?
    My brother tells stories from the late 80's early 90's when cars would be strutineered, the restrictors measured, then they would start the road section, drive down the road to a remote service crew (in those days they had many dotted around the landscape) and have the restrictor removed/changed to a larger one.

    He never told me which teams but he believed it was quite common.

  5. #3464
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sleezattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    3,342
    Like
    737
    Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grundo Farb View Post
    My brother tells stories from the late 80's early 90's when cars would be strutineered, the restrictors measured, then they would start the road section, drive down the road to a remote service crew (in those days they had many dotted around the landscape) and have the restrictor removed/changed to a larger one.

    He never told me which teams but he believed it was quite common.
    Considering that the restrictors were paint dabbed, and drilled and wired with ether lead of tamperproof stainless seals and that scrutineers could do spot checks anywhere, anytime......

    Kinda a huge risk---do you remember Toyota's 1 year ban and stripped of WRC points when their cheat was discovered? Or Fords $250,000 fine when they notified the FIA that their Sierra V6 (built by some old friends of mine) for Stig Blomqvist ran '87 Monte carlo with LH Jet-tronic Bosch injection rather than the Bosch Le they had homologated the car with (as if it made any difference---poor ol 2.8 V6 barely made 210 hp)

    That said I have it very good source that during '86 season---how coincidental for the current scandal!----in the FIA Cup for 2wd WRC the VW team could--and did---change all sorts of crazy things including head and intake at last service before Final ATC, and they just happened to have a wooden case with every pain color you could think of and both lead and stainless seals..
    How convenient...Said the guy watching---a notorious, well known long term "Production" class guy here in US who was outrageous in his cheating...."Damn THOSE GUYS were good, I was really impressed."

    Who can say?
    John Vanlandingham
    Sleezattle WA, USA
    Vive le Prole-le-ralliat

  6. Likes: stefanvv (23rd September 2015)
  7. #3465
    Senior Member itix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,366
    Like
    992
    Liked 778 Times in 419 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by stefanvv View Post
    And what's illegal about that? I see the same restrictor size of 34mm.....
    It baffles me that you don't know the infamous Toyota cheat... They still spoke about it when I started watching rallying in the late 90s.

    They built device around the mandatory restrictor that would hold the restrictor towards the turbine housing with springs. The inlet air hose was then put over the restrictor and the restrictor pulled out while hose clamps secured the restrictor in out position, thus letting more air in behind the restrictor.

    If you wanted to inspect the thing, you needed to remove the hose clamps and voila, the restrictor snaps back in place via the springs and all looks well.

  8. #3466
    Senior Member makinen_fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,983
    Like
    753
    Liked 638 Times in 330 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by itix View Post
    It baffles me that you don't know the infamous Toyota cheat... They still spoke about it when I started watching rallying in the late 90s.

    They built device around the mandatory restrictor that would hold the restrictor towards the turbine housing with springs. The inlet air hose was then put over the restrictor and the restrictor pulled out while hose clamps secured the restrictor in out position, thus letting more air in behind the restrictor.

    If you wanted to inspect the thing, you needed to remove the hose clamps and voila, the restrictor snaps back in place via the springs and all looks well.
    I think his comment was sarcastic

  9. Likes: stefanvv (23rd September 2015)
  10. #3467
    Senior Member itix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,366
    Like
    992
    Liked 778 Times in 419 Posts
    Ah yes... Didn't consider that possibility.

  11. #3468
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Zürich, CH
    Posts
    1,857
    Like
    1
    Liked 54 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by itix View Post
    I don't have a definitive answer to that question... But certainly not the Germans, that's for sure.

    If the mathematical equation of the car had a solution, the Germans are the closest to that solution... But cars aren't mathematics and can't be understood by calculus. All off topic I guess but I have never been a fan of the German approach.

    I like the Italians and French but also some of the Japanese efforts. Korea is coming closer to something likeable.

    Americans have always been too big and too brash for my taste.

    China has so far only been able to give me the chuckles car wise. We'll see about the future.

    I've liked Peugeot for a long time (minus the 207) due to their rally programme when I was a kid so...

    Now back to WRC stuff.

    Maybe the VW budget might see some slahes if there are any proactive heads in VAG group (smart group that uses the abbreviation for vagina btw) but other than that we shouldn't expect any major changes
    Finally somebody other than me, who's not that impressed with german cars. I have always been into Italian and French car brands, and especially the rare sport cars.

    On the matter of there will be effects on the VW motorsport programs .... trust me there will. If you follow CNBC or Bloomberg, you will get the sense of how serious this actually is ... not only for the many law suits awaiting them, but also for future earnings for the company. There is a reason that Angela Merkel is involved in this now, and that's because German carmakers, is 20% of the total German exports!!

    I do think, due the the company called VW, that it's actually that brand that will be most under threat, and I do expects the VW program in the WRC to be stopped by the end of this year at the latest. The last thing they want with the VW brand is to participate in what is percieved as a poluting by the normal people. Furthermore, the VW group will actually have to look at the political interest in the company, and their stockholders more than anything. So I guess cost-cutting will be on the agenda, after the law-suits have been settles, and there is no way that the WRC program will fit into that.
    Fan of WRC and MotoGP.

  12. #3469
    Objective observer stefanvv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wonderlamd
    Posts
    6,715
    Like
    1,558
    Liked 1,170 Times in 791 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by itix View Post
    Ah yes... Didn't consider that possibility.
    makinen_fan was right, I was a bit ironic. Physically the restrictor is there with the same size exactly how is said in the regulations. The rest is left to the brilliant engineers to find a side door and lawyers to stretch the regulation words anyway they want. But obviously Toyota knew what they did wrong.
    "With that car, your brain can actually never keep up"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4IRMYuE1hI

  13. #3470
    Senior Member Lundefaret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    658
    Like
    332
    Liked 887 Times in 277 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grundo Farb View Post
    My brother tells stories from the late 80's early 90's when cars would be strutineered, the restrictors measured, then they would start the road section, drive down the road to a remote service crew (in those days they had many dotted around the landscape) and have the restrictor removed/changed to a larger one.

    He never told me which teams but he believed it was quite common.
    Going from the "free for all" group B regulations, to the very tight Group A regulations ment heavier cars with much less power. In the hunt for hp it was done a lot of "tricks". Everything from Lancias extra air vents behind the license plate, to cheating with restrictors and turbo pressure etc. In the USA there is a lot of great stories on technical cheating in NASCAR, with the 3/4 car, the banana car, nitrous or fuel in the roll cage etc. It would be cool to get similar stories from the Group A days out in the open. Engineers are very creative, and some of their solutions to cheating is extremely clever!
    https://www.facebook.com/noseendfirst?ref=hl#

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •