Results 1 to 10 of 23

Threaded View

  1. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Old Trafford
    Posts
    6,991
    Like
    23
    Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
    I wonder if a little bit of investment on one high speed corridor to show off the potential of high-speed rail would kick start a trend of other states following to get their own high speed line?

    The case of the Acela Express from Washington--New York--Boston has already reduced demand for air travel within that region. But even though AMTRAK classes the service as 'High Speed' the 454 mile journey takes 7 hours! That's only an average speed of 65mph.

    Acela Express

    Like the American line, the Virgin Pendolino service from Glasgow to London has to share the conventional line with freight trains but still manages to complete the 401 mile route in just over 4 hours, averaging just under 100mph despite a lower maximum speed of 125mph compare with the 150mph top speed of the Acela.

    Virgin Pendolino

    For comparison with a dedicated high-speed service, the Eurostar from London to Paris completes the 307 mile journey in just over 2 hours with an average speed of 136mph (186mph max).



    Amtrak wouldn't have to spend a fortune building specialised high speed rail. Surely moderate investment on the current lines would be able to increase speeds on many inter city routes by 50+mph, making them competitive with short haul airlines.
    Last edited by Brown, Jon Brow; 19th May 2015 at 00:05.
    Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •