Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thread: 1996 f1
Threaded View
-
12th April 2015, 11:35 #17
Superb.
I don't understand this statement. Historically, any technology developed for F1 may be adopted by automakers as a consequence.But it's more important to me in F1, that it's a natural/understandable progression of the automotive industry.
The problem that I see killing F1 is the madness around energy recovery systems. That appears to have been driven by the automotive industry and has been a costly, environmentally damaging and fruitless exercise.
If you doubt what I say look to see how many actual hybrids there are on the roads so many years after the sky started falling.
These auto makers have changed F1 in a way that it may never recover from. I fully support Formula E being incorporated into the F1 weekend. I do not support the incorporation of ER systems in F1 that will likely only find a home in long distance freight.Last edited by Whyzars; 12th April 2015 at 11:47.



Reply With Quote
1 Ogier 2 Solberg 3 Fourmaux 4 Evans 5 Neuville 6 Katsuta 7 Armstrong 8 McErlean Skarderud Sent fra min SM-S901B via Tapatalk
[WRC 2026 Pickems] R1 - RALLY...