Results 1 to 10 of 43
Thread: WRC Engines
Threaded View
-
14th March 2015, 04:48 #10Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Sleezattle, Washington, USA
- Posts
- 3,342
- Like
- 737
- Liked 558 Times in 295 Posts
Well Post no3 is you responding to me where you say
Helps when you click "quote" when replying..So your trying to tell me every WRC engine is singly describe by one set of rule (i.e. Limitations). Every manufacture has their own take on the engine regulations that why you see VW dominating because their engine is much strong than the rest. The formula one has limitations like the WRC and I don't see Renault and Mercedes with the same engines, likewise with Citroen, M-Sport, VW, Etc. The 2007 Subaru WRC 2.0L boxer looks, sounds and performs just like the Citroen C4 WRC 2.0L I4...... I don't think so
And nobody here "was saying every WRC engine is the same" but if they were so crazy "saying the contrary' without numbers, dimensions, sizes etc is just as pointless.
And maybe I mis-read what you're lat line said--or impliedNot at all.. It seems you are not really interested in any of the details like bore, stroke rod length valve sizes cam timing and duration--which only tells half the story or the turbo turbine wheel and compressor wheel dimensions, the pressure ratios in the turbos.....So your trying to tell me every WRC engine is singly describe by one set of rule (i.e. Limitations).
Or is it that you want others to supply all that data??
And for some reason you still haven't said what your name is and what class you do up in Canada...
Is there some reason for that? The refusal is kind of like turning your back on somebody that you began a discussion with... it's mildly put---odd.John Vanlandingham
Sleezattle WA, USA
Vive le Prole-le-ralliat



Reply With Quote

https://youtu.be/e9BQp0M5uzI?si=fFZQUlewl2rpORBQ I’m not sure if this was posted here in this forum but in case it hasn’t here it is. Richard Hammond alongside Oliver Solberg, THIS is how you...
Rally Discussion and Bar Talk...