Results 121 to 130 of 136
-
19th November 2014, 20:14 #121Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Chelmsford, Essex, United Kingdom
- Posts
- 10,568
- Like
- 695
- Liked 653 Times in 512 Posts
Thanks for that Mark.
Good if still sad news.I still exist and still find the forum occasionally. Busy busy
-
4th December 2014, 13:47 #122Senior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2003
- Location
- London, UK
- Posts
- 1,983
- Like
- 753
- Liked 638 Times in 330 Posts
FIA verdict on the crash
http://www.fia.com/news/accident-panel
-
4th December 2014, 17:44 #123Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 2,607
- Like
- 28
- Liked 186 Times in 146 Posts
Interesting reading. So the main way they'll be addressing the problem is some sort of speed limit under yellow flags, which certainly seems sensible.
I'm not sure I fully agree with this conclusion:
The implication of this seems to be that the outcome would have been no different in Bianchi's accident if he'd hit bare armco instead of the crane, because of the speed involved. But not all accidents happen at that speed. There must be a wide range of speeds and impact angles where the car's crumple zones can do some good, if there is something at the right height for them to hit.11. It is not feasible to mitigate the injuries Bianchi suffered by either enclosing the driver’s cockpit, or fitting skirts to the crane. Neither approach is practical due to the very large forces involved in the accident between a 700kg car striking a 6500kg crane at a speed of 126kph. There is simply insufficient impact structure on a F1 car to absorb the energy of such an impact without either destroying the driver’s survival cell, or generating non-survivable decelerations.
I wonder how much this conclusion was influenced by the difficulty and cost of modifying (and then inspecting and certifying) all the recovery vehicles at every circuit.
Good to see they're finally going to stop Bernie meddling with start times to suit his TV customers:
It is proposed that a regulation or guideline be established such that the Start time of an event shall not be less than 4 hours before either sunset or dusk, except in the case of night races.
It is also recommended that the F1 Calendar is reviewed in order to avoid, where possible, races taking place during local rainy seasons.
-
4th December 2014, 18:34 #124Banned
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Posts
- 3,186
- Like
- 1
- Liked 152 Times in 123 Posts
We see 220mph Indycar crashes all year long, and in some of them the drivers don't even get a scratch. What hurt Bianchi is that he struck his head on the crane. Had he hit the Armco it would have probably been an ordinary crash.
I have not seen any injuries reported than the head injury, so you can say the car did it's job protecting him. The helmet probably deserves some credit here too because hitting your head on something at that speed is simply not survivable, yet Jules still has some hope.
The recovery vehicles wouldn't be a problem if they kept them behind the barriers. I did not know they were allowed there, but if I did, it would have been easy to see this coming.I wonder how much this conclusion was influenced by the difficulty and cost of modifying (and then inspecting and certifying) all the recovery vehicles at every circuit.
-
4th December 2014, 22:43 #125Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Location
- Old Trafford
- Posts
- 6,991
- Like
- 23
- Liked 66 Times in 54 Posts
Last edited by Brown, Jon Brow; 4th December 2014 at 22:45.
Tazio 14/3/2015: I'll give every member on this forum 1,000.00 USD if McLaren fails to podium this season!
-
5th December 2014, 01:16 #126Senior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Location
- Perth, Australia
- Posts
- 5,675
- Like
- 6
- Liked 47 Times in 33 Posts
I don't think that is correct, I don't think his head impacted the crane, the injury is not an impact injury, concentrated in one point, but a spread injury throughout the brain caused by the rapid deceleration, not an impact. I remember reading at the time that there was not any impact noted on the helmet. I fear if his helmet had contacted the crane at 125kph they'd have been picking up pieces
"I" before "E" except after "C". Weird.
-
5th December 2014, 01:52 #127Banned
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Posts
- 3,186
- Like
- 1
- Liked 152 Times in 123 Posts
One of us got some bad information becvause the article I read said the helmet was damaged. I've also seen the crash footage and it sure looks to me like his head hits the crane.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/mot...-accident.html
I can find a link to where it talked about the helmet damage, but I think the video is pretty conclusive.Last edited by Doc Austin; 5th December 2014 at 01:55.
-
5th December 2014, 19:40 #128Banned
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Posts
- 3,186
- Like
- 1
- Liked 152 Times in 123 Posts
Well, all right.
-
6th December 2014, 18:42 #129
-
7th December 2014, 00:15 #130Banned
- Join Date
- May 2001
- Posts
- 3,186
- Like
- 1
- Liked 152 Times in 123 Posts
Well, all right.


Reply With Quote


Toyota 1-2-3-4-5 on the first run of the shakedown . . . Hyundai 6-7-8. . . We need Ott and Thierry to put in a big shift this weekend. They need to keep us in some suspense. .
[WRC] FORUM8 Rally Japan 2025