Quote Originally Posted by journeyman racer View Post
Jerez in 97 was a last grasp attempt at getting Hakkinen a win, before a long off-season. You take a win any way you can, particularly when you haven't yet won, or it's infrequent. Nobody knew, at the time, Hakkinen was going to win the next two titles.
Why did Hakkinen deserve the win more than Coulthard?