Irritating that they cut the TV transfer just before WRC2!
:batman:
Printable View
Irritating that they cut the TV transfer just before WRC2!
:batman:
Henning S asking people in Sweden about a front window for a Fabia. Haha
Rally Sweden @RallySweden 2m2 minutes agoMore
Solberg is asking for a new windshield. When asked about how Colin's Crest looked: "I don't know, I couldn't see it!" #RallySweden
:D
They cancel a stage because of too high an average speed? If they mentioned a specific spot and all the drivers said that's too dangerous, fair enough, but without any further context that's ridiculous.
This one is for N.O.T.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...5d4ba0e0eb.jpg
Amazing Ott! Keep it on!
to cancel the stage is stupid, however i do partially agree that the average speed is crazy, but the stage should be run this year and maybe exclude it from next year onwards.
The autistic welsh would probably include a million chicanes to ruin the stage, i really cannot see any use for them apart from digging mud pits like they used to in the old ages.
Rumors on another forum that drivers say the cars are too wide for the narrow parts of the stage. Not seen any evidance of that myself yet.
Steve (from Wales)
So they cancelled the stage that was schedule to broadcast live in Red Bull TV :(
the problem is not the speed of the cars, as the new ones really aren't that much faster than the old ones. its just the stage itself.
average speed on Knon:
tanak: 137.8 km/h
breen: 135.2 km/h
Lefebvre: 129.3 km/h
Tidemand: 128.1 km/h
I watched full stage from wrc+ and that is just bs. There is no narrow places.
Plenty of "flat maybe" type of corners in +160km/h. Even Tidemand with R5 had 128.1 avg speed. I don't know who thought this would be suitable stage for WRC, maybe Per Eklund with Saab 96? :D
The average speed itself says nothing. In 2016 Barum we had a stage with 125 average (R5) which sure isn't even close in danger to famous Pindula where the average was 114. The main reason is that the first one had one junction/hairpin on 14 km.
There are even faster stages in Ypres where average speed is bellow 110 just because there is huge number of square junctions which make the roads looking way slower then they are.
To this case... They made the new cars faster so it's beyond me how can they be surprised that the cars actually go fast...
RIDICULOUS DECISION. Why do 10 kmh guarantee accidents?!?! This is technical progress, of course the cars must become faster and faster. First rallies in french mountains a century ago, avg speeds were probably 50-60kmh then rose to 70-80, should they frozen the development back then until today!??!?! I am sick of careerists whose only goal is to avoid the risk of getting responsible.
The avarage speed is not what make it dangerous, it`s the fast parts. Stages with slower avarage could have well as fast and even faster parts, just that it also haven more slower/twistier parts as well, or even the ugly heyball chicane`s. Aaah just politics fro FIA this.
Can't they just put a kilometre of chicanes at the end to drop the average speed? Surely that makes the rest of the stage safe.
tiny vs BIG balls...
https://s23.postimg.org/y7ybh531n/IMG_0584.jpg
With the total and utter chaos it was getting out, we decided against stressing around to get into a somewhat ok spot at Vargåsen.
I'm sure we could've made it. But it would be just about and no guarantee for a spot that's worth the extra time and money.
Shit happens really. Frustrating to miss out on Historics :)
Where are the guys who u derestimated Toyota
Sent from my 6039S using Tapatalk
currently toyota having a previous sweden winner at the wheel are losing to neuville who was a nobody in sweden and they will be probably be eclipsed by a non winner in car that ogier struggles with... how does that make them a good car special boy ?
If toyota was equal or close to the competition Latvala would have a quite comfortable lead... and what about hanninen ?
basic simpletons unable for complicated thoughts.