Results 1 to 10 of 86
Hybrid View
-
25th March 2019, 17:43 #1
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Posts
- 2,858
- Like
- 62
- Liked 478 Times in 371 Posts
You’re not really getting my point. The point is you can either take reliability into account or you can set it aside. If you’re taking it onboard, all of what you say is valid just as it’s valid to state that reliability decided the 2016 title. Otherwise, you must ignore the DNF’s and just look at the points conveniently ignoring the reasons behind it to reach the conclusions you want.
Last edited by The Black Knight; 25th March 2019 at 18:11.
-
25th March 2019, 18:13 #2
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- Philadelphia
- Posts
- 5,943
- Like
- 1,228
- Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
Maybe we are 2 ships sailing past each other in the fog. I hear you and from my perspective, I take the reliability and other mitigating factors into account.
It's funny how a certain unnamed member will defend Ricciardo's performance in 2018 and summarily dismiss the same points and reasons (most importantly reliability) for Hamilton in 2016.
lol. Anyways, we are all good now that I get where you are coming from. cheersLast edited by truefan72; 25th March 2019 at 18:17.
you can't argue with results.
haha probably, i dont watch that either. but it sure looks like its 50% about getting the team principals to complain about everything haha f1 have boys, wrc have men. cyril is a boy.
WRC main class in 2025