Forum complaining

[BDunnell]

Whilst I understand where you're coming from, I don't really see why not having watched as many GP's as others means I'm not as able to pass comment on GP's that I have seen.

To me, this much is obvious in those whose attitudes I object to most. I'm genuinely not trying to be rude in saying that, just stating a fact.

[steveaki13]

Put it this way — I know the true F1 enthusiasts on here, and am very happy to discuss the sport with them, no matter what their opinions are. Unfortunately, they tend to get shouted down by those who are absurdly, often childishly, vehement in their views one way or the other. That I find a shame.

Agreed.

Some people here do get overshadowed by people who post in such a way that it appears threatening and that forces some who don't want the confrontation to back down. While some post hundreds of posts most don't read.

[BDunnell]

Agreed.

Some people here do get overshadowed by people who post in such a way that it appears threatening and that forces some who don't want the confrontation to back down. While some post hundreds of posts most don't read.

The irony of this is that a few of those in question are people whose contributions on other subjects are intelligent, sensible, eloquent and so on — people, in short, I would never wish to ignore completely. But turn the discussion to F1 and they behave... er, rather differently.

[tfp]

Shouldnt this thread be in the forum feedback section?

[ioan]

Put in such an eloquent and impartial way lol.

Off all people you should refrain commenting after Lewy's N-th F-up of the season.

Anyway you just made Daniels point valid with your fanboyish post.

I guess Hamy fans are a lot like him. Well done, again!

[BDunnell]

There, above, is an example of exactly what I and others are getting at.

It is noteworthy, I think, that the discussion was utterly civil in spite of disagreements until that post got thrown in.

[Daniel]

There, above, is an example of exactly what I and others are getting at.

It is noteworthy, I think, that the discussion was utterly civil in spite of disagreements until that post got thrown in.

I'm sorry Ben, but do you really feel that I was treated in a civil manner earlier on in this thread? Sure iOan threw fuel on the fire as he often does, but others before him had chucked fuel on the fire too. Two wrongs don't make a right etc etc.

[BDunnell]

I'm sorry Ben, but do you really feel that I was treated in a civil manner earlier on in this thread? Sure iOan threw fuel on the fire as he often does, but others before him had chucked fuel on the fire too. Two wrongs don't make a right etc etc.

As a matter of opinion, I didn't think your tone was wise in the first place. Anyway, I've said my piece, fat lot of good the objections I and others have voiced will ever do.

[ioan]

There, above, is an example of exactly what I and others are getting at.

It is noteworthy, I think, that the discussion was utterly civil in spite of disagreements until that post got thrown in.

Excuse me for not reading pages of pro Hamilton gibberish before expressing an opinion. What next? No right to expression cause it bothers you? Are we not all equal in rights?

[Daniel]

As a matter of opinion, I didn't think your tone was wise in the first place. Anyway, I've said my piece, fat lot of good the objections I and others have voiced will ever do.

Sure, my tone wasn't good, but I was annoyed and when you're annoyed you don't think twice about the things you say.

Whilst I understand the objections, what about the objections that I've voiced? Surely it's worth discussing the way people feel on both sides?