Results 41 to 50 of 78
-
24th February 2011, 19:49 #41
- Join Date
- Jun 2000
- Location
- Lowest Common Denominator
- Posts
- 5,927
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chuck34
Originally Posted by chuck34DVR . . . . . Life is too short to watch commercials.
-
24th February 2011, 20:18 #42
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chuck34
Grand-Am is owned and managed by NASCAR.
The NASCAR drivers who participate in the 24 hours of Daytona do so because of sponsor(NASCAR) commitments.
-
24th February 2011, 22:18 #43
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Posts
- 129
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So here's what I'm wondering...
It's the last race of the year. Assume they get some attention and momentum, well, what's the week after? A NASCAR race with those NASCAR guys who may have run, but nothing for the people who tune in, say "this is pretty cool, I'd like to see more INDYCAR." By the time INDYCAR comes back (with the end and beginning of NASCAR season in the middle of their off-season), any new viewers for the Vegas race will have forgotten what they saw in the sport.
And that's with a lot of assumptions. As a racing fan, I think this is very cool, but thinking big picture growing the sport, I really just see this as free press and not much else. Still, rather see Bernard try and miss the mark than do nothing like George liked to do.
-
25th February 2011, 04:25 #44
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Location
- www.fanviewpoint.com
- Posts
- 102
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree that 5m is a boatload of cake, but will a driver be able to get a top, competetive ride? Will a Hornish/Montoya/Robby Gordon/Tony Stewart get in a "B" ride?
http://www.fanviewpoint.com/2011/02/...d-in-veas.html
Quotes from Bernard.
-
25th February 2011, 12:58 #45
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lee Roy
Originally Posted by Lee RoyThe overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
25th February 2011, 13:00 #46
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Originally Posted by anthonyvopThe overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
25th February 2011, 14:28 #47
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chuck34
NASCAR and their sponsorship deals pretty much do that. It is called a contract. Driver's sign it and they have to abide by it. The Gainsco deal is a perfect example. Gainsco's deal to stay in the Grand-Am includes getting Jimmie Johnson to run the 24 hours. J.J. doesn't mind because he makes some nice change.
Originally Posted by chuck34
Just Google Gainsco and NASCAR and see for yourself.
OH And haven't you noticed how NASCAR drivers seem to drive in the Grand-Am yet never seem to show up at a ALMS, Rally, World Challenge, ICS or any other of a myriad of non-oval races?
-
25th February 2011, 15:30 #48
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
- Posts
- 3,845
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
Originally Posted by anthonyvopThe overall technical objective in racing is the achievement of a vehicle configuration, acceptable within the practical interpretation of the rules, which can traverse a given course in a minimum time. -Milliken
-
25th February 2011, 16:19 #49
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 2,443
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I gotta go with Anthony on this one - NASCAR drivers tend to do other series that somehow benefit NASCAR.... NASCAR owns Grand-Am - if GrandAm is ever going to succeed they NEED the Cup drivers to participate to bring any attention to the event at all.... I am not sure what the deal with Gainsco is , but my guess is that they have enough$$ to really help out Grand AM but not enough $$ to help out cup - so somehow NASCAR is throwing them a bone for their loyalty... As for the drivers, who wouldn't want to drive in the 24 hors of Daytona? The cars are pretty easy, the speed are slow enough to be pretty safe, it is kind of cool event, it gives the driver more street cred than just driving cup cars in a circle AND is keep the big boss happy.... I would imagine most do it for free for all of the above reasons.....
-
25th February 2011, 16:30 #50
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chuck34
Originally Posted by chuck34
Originally Posted by chuck34
Originally Posted by chuck34
Minor, oval series just plays into the NASCAR Demo. When was the last time a name NASCAR driver drove in the ALMS, World, Challenge, ICS or Rally?
Norris on the Safety Car in Canada: ‘In Miami it helped me win, today it helped me lose’. McLaren’s Lando Norris was philosophical after missing out on a second career victory in Canada, but...
2024 Formula 1 Preview &...