Thread: TV ratings rise for WRC
-
6th March 2007, 16:39 #21
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,388
- Like
- 208
- Liked 670 Times in 361 Posts
Originally Posted by A.F.F.
-
6th March 2007, 17:47 #22
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Posts
- 10,199
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jonkkaAja kovaa Pena.
-
6th March 2007, 23:53 #23
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Location
- Rue de Hanaböle
- Posts
- 13,757
- Like
- 3
- Liked 6 Times in 2 Posts
My major disappontment is the idea of having a studio and guests in the first place. If they had a pre-show with guests, it would be ok, but the rally day shows should be all about rallying.
I have a huge respect on the guests they have had but like I said, in rallying day I'm more interested about what has happened on route than what Tuominen asks about his guests. And, his questions really aren't worldshakers. If commentator has just said Mikko Hirvonen ended up having a good day, Tuominen "asks" his guest something like;" So, Mikko Hirvonen seemed to have a good day?" Like jonkka said, the role of guest is pretty small and I've asked the same question myself, what's the use ???
The problem is that the amount of footage is so poor that they have to fill the shows up with this... crap which IMO really understimates the viewer, not just a rallyfan. Not to mention the quality of the footage. It's very poor too comparing to earlier years. I hope they still develop.
The consept YLE had with their rallying was pretty much perfect. The reporter made the show, visited service areas and locations and most of the time, KNEW about what he was talking about.
MTV3 decided to make this another F1 studio with Sasha and other losers who would prefer much more to commentate slalom and other uninteresting sports.
Pheww.... I'm done for nowAnother Flying Finn
I admire your will Mirek to argue with the windmills here.
WRC main class in 2025