Thread: new engine rules
-
3rd June 2010, 17:33 #31Originally Posted by anthonyvop
My idea being the cars can run a lot faster then they usually will. Smaller displacement engines might run closer to flat-out the whole time, while a bigger engine would have to run in economy mode, but the power would be there when needed. Plus, more cautions = faster times near the end.
To me it has such an elegant simplicity: A 200 mile race, using 50 gallons of fuel.
I think the DTM uses ballasts added to winners & podium finishers to balance teams out over the course of the season. This is an interesting idea, and seems to work pretty well. It also opens up a lot of different strategies.N.Hayden L.Hamilton D.Earnhardt R.Gordon S.Speed T.Stewart J.P.Montoya G.Rahal Ferrari Lotus
-
3rd June 2010, 17:41 #32
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 3,189
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by e2mtt
Chevy built special small-port cylinder heads for the Corvette that were designed to maximize hp with the possible fuel flow, that were ONLY given to the factory team.
With in a few years Chevy was racing against itself because only they could spend the millions to make parts specifically designed to defeat the spec. restriction.
Restrictors and spec. racing is a cancer that should be killed.
Eliminate the aero gimmicks and speeds will fall.
-
3rd June 2010, 17:47 #33
Another engine formula idea that I want to see - NO MORE PUSH TO PASS BUTTON!!!!
Give them NOS! 1 bottle of NOS per race weekend, to be used at will.N.Hayden L.Hamilton D.Earnhardt R.Gordon S.Speed T.Stewart J.P.Montoya G.Rahal Ferrari Lotus
-
3rd June 2010, 17:50 #34Originally Posted by Bob RiebeN.Hayden L.Hamilton D.Earnhardt R.Gordon S.Speed T.Stewart J.P.Montoya G.Rahal Ferrari Lotus
-
3rd June 2010, 18:45 #35
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Starter"Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
-
3rd June 2010, 20:23 #36
- Join Date
- Jan 2002
- Posts
- 5,522
- Like
- 0
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
What i find interesting are the aerodynamic possibilities between a in-line 4 and a V-6.
By allowing 2 different engine layouts you have guaranteed an Aero-War
-
3rd June 2010, 21:05 #37
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 216
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
-
3rd June 2010, 21:08 #38
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 216
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by V12
-
3rd June 2010, 21:08 #39
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- New Jersey
- Posts
- 2,443
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I like Starter's idea - limit the size of the on board fuel tank. I would add that they should also specify the re-fueling apparatus and make sure it is good and slow (in racing terms) - and not a drop spilled.
-
3rd June 2010, 21:08 #40
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 14,547
- Like
- 0
- Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by anthonyvop
The fact is, how the chassis minimum dimensions are laid out will be the final arbiter really of what engine config would likely work best."Water for my horses, beer for my men and mud for my turtle".
Desafio Ruta 40 - classification after stage 3: T1 Ultimate Cars: 1. SAU Yazeed Al-Rajhi (Toyota), 11:21' 2. QAT Nasser Al-Attiyah (Prodrive), + 2' 3. BRA Lucas Moraes (Toyota). + 9' 4. ARG...
2024 World Rally-Raid Championship