Results 551 to 560 of 614
Thread: Rally Jordan 2010
-
3rd April 2010, 16:34 #551
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 202
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyRAC
Even the current system would be fine if drivers weren't allowed to know splits and times during the last stage of the day. Stopping any non-emergency radio contact between teams and drivers would do it, but it'd be difficult to enforce. Drivers could still slow down at the end of the stage in the hopes of getting a better position, but without knowing what was going on, it'd be a risky move.
-
3rd April 2010, 16:43 #552
Well as Wilson and Ford are just as happy with these tactics where do you all suggest Ogier and Sordo move to? Both manufacturers are pulling these tactic not just the evil French as some of you seem to imply.
-
3rd April 2010, 16:44 #553
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 760
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Or men pop out from the bush with a sign. For qualifying, then I would just try to qualify slower. For lower class sweeping, you have to think marketing as well, people wants to see the fast cars.
Going back to reverse seems to be the best choice if you want changes.
-
3rd April 2010, 16:50 #554
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Posts
- 2,205
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Someone could tell me why Flodin lost 27m in the last stage to Armindo and yet is still in front of him in overall classification ?
-
3rd April 2010, 17:06 #555
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Posts
- 10,199
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyRAC
The system that they did have in AUS a few years back, where drivers could choose their starting order was best sofar.Aja kovaa Pena.
-
3rd April 2010, 17:06 #556
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Eindhoven
- Posts
- 2,425
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyRAC
How did the system worked in the old days, where the drivers were seeded a different starting number (almost) every rally? Was it just a draw or..?
-
3rd April 2010, 17:15 #557
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 760
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tomi
Of course, you can have qualifying in addition to shakedown. Again I point out its better to qualify slower so you can start later, same thing. However, let highest qualifier choose his starting position, and so on for the next fastest qualifier. This is still down to tactic and will get abused.
Originally Posted by jrally
-
3rd April 2010, 17:29 #558
- Join Date
- Mar 2001
- Posts
- 10,199
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tmx
And this same could be used also to decide next days driving order, the fastes chooses where he want to start next day.... and so on.Aja kovaa Pena.
-
3rd April 2010, 17:33 #559
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Exmuhle.....
- Posts
- 5,307
- Like
- 2,637
- Liked 1,263 Times in 684 Posts
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82678
Seems perfectly sensible to me.
Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???
-
3rd April 2010, 17:47 #560
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Posts
- 202
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyRAC
toyota running pajari, msport's sponsor running sesks... im waiting on hyundai to run someone else too, since they pushed hard for keeping rally1s. need to have space for new guys. oli, lindholm,...
Rally Discussion and Bar Talk...