Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 55
  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,170
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by veeten
    Well, consider that most of the 'big names' have either cut back or reduced their overall F1 efforts, it seems that Williams had no other option than Cosworth.
    Mercedes & Ferrari aren't looking to supply the entire grid, BMW has gone t!ts-up, and Renault & Toyota aren't going to be making any new deals in the not-to-distant future, Cosworth seems to be the 'supplier of last resort'.

    With the whole 'cost cutting' craze going about, and the lack of major sponsorship for teams to afford more expensive engine deals, Cosworth will be the choice for those coming in or cutting back, unless there is a willingness to involve more independent builders or manufacturers to 'step up' and become powertrain suppliers.
    They had a contract with Toyota which they broke...so..
    “Leave me alone!”

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Lancashire, UK
    Posts
    1,615
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Apparently Williams were offered a preferential development deal with Cosworth - whatever that means. Maybe the engine will be tuned more to suit the Williams car than the other new teams - and it's a benefit for Cosworth because they can start testing sooner than waiting for the new teams to build their cars.

    It's a sensible choice, mainly because the FIA will go to great lengths to ensure the new teams are kept competitive, and as a by-product Williams end up with a progressively stronger engine.

    Plus, Cosworth are independent. Apparently Renault were stalling on a deal because both teams were interested in Kubica, so Renault were allegedly using the engine as leverage to make sure Williams didn't sign him up.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    everywhere. always.
    Posts
    1,892
    Like
    0
    Liked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    interesting. Williams' season next year just got unpredicatble, more so than we previously thought. Either the cossie will be a complete lump and stay like that, or their development thing will be used to their advantage, not to mention lotus', campos' and manors as well.
    Congratulations Sebastian Vettel. Champion of the season of seasons.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    3,778
    Like
    3
    Liked 50 Times in 33 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonic
    This isn't pin the tail on the donkey. Head and Williams will know the relative strengths and weakness of each engine. And yes, cost will be a factor but not the only one.
    I doubt very much that Cosworth could narrow the gap to the top engine makers and close four years worth of development with the resources they have, especially since their last engines were not that competitive. The power gains Mercedes and Ferrari especially have made even with the engine freeze are quite impressive.

    Cosworth aren't going to develop the engine on charity money, they'll calculate what profit they can make from the engine deals and tailor their development investment to suit. Given that the Cosworth engine deals are supposed to be cheap in line with the FIA engine cost proposals that isn't going to be a large amount of money. Manufacturer backed teams on the other hand....

    Williams are in a poor position financially, I hope they aren't choosing this engine out of desperation.

  5. #15
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    to be honest, if I were to rank the engines right now in terms of quality it would be:

    #1 Mercedes
    #2 Renault
    #3 Toyota
    #4 Ferrari
    #5 BMW

    whatever deal Williams are getting with cosworth is going to challenged by the other teams, engine suppliers and new entrants who will be now getting a diminisehd product to the benefit of williams. Also especially if rumors are true and the fia is going to do the ridiculous thing of asking Mercedes to tune down the engine.

    It is another sad day in F1 where now the FIA is looking to create artificial parity to the detriment of the sport.

    If they just got rid of that engine freeze nonse4sne and allowed teams to develop what they want, you would see a natural parity come to place without all this nonsense.
    you can't argue with results.

  6. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Loughborough, Leicestershire
    Posts
    1,329
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    If all the teams have agreed for to this 'cost cap' then we don't need an engine freeze.

    Teams can have 1 of 3 things:
    1. an amazing engine and an aerodynamically limited car
    2. amazing aerodynamics and a poor engine
    3. a mediorce engine and aero

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Georgian Bay, On.
    Posts
    3,513
    Like
    0
    Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Cosworth have basically had a year to work on the engine and still have more time. I do not think any of us have a clue as to what kind of power they are getting.
    What the FIA do regarding rules may go in a new direction after Fri. depending on the results of the election.
    If it is Ari I expect considerably less rule changes without proper consultation.

  8. #18
    Senior Member truefan72's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    5,943
    Like
    1,228
    Liked 373 Times in 289 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Easy Drifter
    Cosworth have basically had a year to work on the engine and still have more time. I do not think any of us have a clue as to what kind of power they are getting.
    What the FIA do regarding rules may go in a new direction after Fri. depending on the results of the election.
    If it is Ari I expect considerably less rule changes without proper consultation.
    no matter what they do , on its own the engine will not be as good as the mercedes, renault toyota or ferrari. And if the FIA chooses to make them more powerful, then the teams will protest. This is not F1 to limit the capabilities of some while promoting others, especially ones that the FIA have aligned themselves with in a feeble attempt to create a single engine supplier mickey mouse series.

    If history is any indication then the cosworth will be what it always is. A serviceable engine, with many reliability issues that is no match to the top 4.
    you can't argue with results.

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    18,921
    Like
    0
    Liked 8 Times in 6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
    WilliamsF1 just lowered the chance of them attracting high rank drivers considerably.
    BANG!! Whoosh!!
    "Ah! shyte!!"
    When in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout

  10. #20
    Admin
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Chester-le-Street, United Kingdom
    Posts
    38,578
    Like
    78
    Liked 128 Times in 94 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by christophulus
    Apparently Williams were offered a preferential development deal with Cosworth - whatever that means.
    Ah the gold support package. 24x7 telephone support to a hotline in India plus engineers guaranteed on site within 3 working days.
    Please 'like' our facebook page http://www.facebook.com/motorsportforums

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •