Results 31 to 40 of 183
Thread: WRC 1.6T or IRC S2000
-
12th May 2009, 01:13 #31
Half the people on this forum complain that Grp.N is boring....1.6T won't be any better. Grp.N WRX/Evos are already 2L turbo, how exciting will WRC be with 1.6T. Exciting to think that Grp.N cars will possibly be faster then World rally cars....dumb idea.
I personally enjoy the Grp.N cars, well driven they are more exciting then WRC cars and S2000 cars.
Go back to the days of Grp.A.....Tristan Kent
-
12th May 2009, 05:51 #32
- Join Date
- Oct 2000
- Posts
- 8,824
- Like
- 2,094
- Liked 2,242 Times in 1,200 Posts
Originally Posted by TKM Jnr
People here should stop thinking just about the power/torque. The current WRCars have bucketloads and they're still terrible to watch, I think the transmissions/chassis are just as important in this respect.
-
12th May 2009, 08:36 #33
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Exmuhle.....
- Posts
- 5,304
- Like
- 2,633
- Liked 1,263 Times in 684 Posts
Originally Posted by BDunnell
Is there a better sound than that of Porsche engined Flat-6 ???
-
12th May 2009, 10:29 #34
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,539
- Like
- 7,845
- Liked 11,208 Times in 4,448 Posts
Originally Posted by TKM JnrStupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
-
12th May 2009, 19:12 #35
- Join Date
- Jan 2004
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 6,388
- Like
- 2,015
- Liked 1,370 Times in 713 Posts
It will always depend on the restrictor, and what else will get limitations I guess, but I expect FIA to decide a couple of hours before the first rally to give the manufacturers more than enough time........
When you have at least 10 manufacturers in S2000, I would have given that a chance in 2010, to get them into the circus - and if S2000 shows not to be good enough, change to 1600T for 2013. That would give them 2 years to construct a new one. But then the 1600T tech rules need to be ready mid 2010 !
-
12th May 2009, 19:28 #36Originally Posted by urabus-denoS2000
BTW, WRC cars are based on group A cars.
http://argent.fia.com/web/fia-public.nsf/2589A7BA2955E0A2C12574FF0051D9F4/$FILE/255%20(2009)-15112008.pdf
A ”Word Rally Car” (WR) is a variant of a fixed model of car, previously homologated in group A and must therefore be assembled as a group A vehicle.
If you look at “APPENDIX J TO THE INTERNATIONAL SPORTING CODE” (http://www.fia.com/en-GB/sport/regul...tingCodeA.aspx
There are no specific regulations for WRC. WRC use the same regulations as group A.
And another btw. Mitsubishi Evo 9 is not valid in group A.“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
12th May 2009, 19:40 #37Originally Posted by Sulland
I would be pleased to see two alive championships, WRC with 1,6T limited boost / high rev engines and IRC with S2000 cars (that are already high rev nice sounded engines).“Don’t eat the yellow snow” Frank Zappa
-
12th May 2009, 19:49 #38
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 2,529
- Like
- 5
- Liked 21 Times in 13 Posts
Wow
-
12th May 2009, 21:52 #39
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Co. Derry, Ireland
- Posts
- 29
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by atsiotras79"Take 'er handy and win every rally around"
( Frank Meagher ) R.I.P
-
12th May 2009, 21:58 #40
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Prague / Eastern Bohemia
- Posts
- 22,539
- Like
- 7,845
- Liked 11,208 Times in 4,448 Posts
The best sounding engine would be flat 6 cylinder N/A engine but that's pretty unrealistic
Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump
This race seems set to tell us several things. Firstly, Redbull may be in a bit of bother with their new chassis which may have inherited the Mercedes no sidepod curse. Secondly, the Championship may...
2024 - Race 9 Canada