Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23
  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    6,410
    Like
    0
    Liked 32 Times in 32 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Malllen
    The ramifications for making an error by sticking to a strategy would seem smaller than the ramifications for taking a gamble and undoing the many calculations the teams have done optimising strategy over the entirity of a GP weekend.

    Of course, changing strategy becomes easier the lower down the field you are, because you would otherwise have nothing to lose anyway.
    The midfield is so tight today you only have to look at Q2 in qualy. Too much to lose.

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,476
    Like
    21
    Liked 20 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wedge
    The midfield is so tight today you only have to look at Q2 in qualy. Too much to lose.
    None of this explains why Ferrari didn't bring Massa in for wets, considering he would've been the yardstick for when Kimi could've changed tyres.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    25,223
    Like
    0
    Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by theugsquirrel
    None of this explains why Ferrari didn't bring Massa in for wets, considering he would've been the yardstick for when Kimi could've changed tyres.
    Exactly, and he had nothing to lose and everything to gain! But hey, there is need for a brain for such a move to be even thought about.
    Michael Schumacher The Best Ever F1 Driver
    Everything I post is my own opinion and I\'ll always try to back it up! :)
    They need us: http://www.ursusarctos.ro

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •