Thread: OT-Too Expensive??
Threaded View
-
27th June 2008, 10:27 #39
- Join Date
- Apr 2003
- Posts
- 283
- Like
- 0
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by !!WALDO!!
Nope, lousy racing. If both Al and Emmo crashed, the race would still be going.
Nope, no connection to the then 900 tracks that ran weekly shows.
Yes but history does know.
1950,1952,1955,1960,1961,1967,1978,1979,1984,1987, 1988,1989,1992,1996,1997*,2002,2004
That's the years when teammates finished first and second in the championship. In all other years minimum one driver findished between the world champion and his teammate in the same car. So it's hard to say, it's only the car. In this case, teammates everytime would finish first and second.
So it's 16 (17 if you count 1997) times out of 58!
I will change my opinion when Ferrari or McLaren does not win the title.
Your point?
ANd by the way: If the McLaren would have been the better car, that would work against your arguments, because Lauda in the Ferrari dominated 1976, until his accident.
You're welcome, we restict the number of men over for safety reasons.
and Bernie not going to bail out for another year. Do you know what happens if the number of teams falls below 8?
Bernie would found a team... But with the best ten teams getting a lot money from the foca there is no chance we will have less than 20 cars...
Haven't a clue what those are - unless it's something to do with that "lemon" 24 hour race :confused: In case you aren't aware, Mountune engines have been used a lot in touring car racing and...
World Rallycross Championship...