Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 91011
Results 101 to 105 of 105
  1. #101
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,912
    Like
    786
    Liked 834 Times in 484 Posts
    Steve please can you explain what is required from the competitor to acknowledge the document/findings? It's said that the team were verbally informed but they 'failed to acknowledge within reasonable time'. How is 'acknowledgement' noteworthy if not necessary?

  2. #102
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    3,095
    Like
    12
    Liked 431 Times in 251 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WRCStan View Post
    Steve please can you explain what is required from the competitor to acknowledge the document/findings? It's said that the team were verbally informed but they 'failed to acknowledge within reasonable time'. How is 'acknowledgement' noteworthy if not necessary?
    I can’t see any requirement in the FIA International Sporting Code (https://www.fia.com/system/files/doc...16.12.2025.pdf) for competitors to sign reports of the Stewards findings and they aren’t signed at F1 meetings. There is, I believe, a dedicated communications platform in F1 for teams, event officials and the Stewards that includes the virtual noticeboard. If this platform requires users to log in then it would be technically quite simple to have a system to log who has viewed what and when. The WRC & ERC use Sportity which does not require viewers to use a personal log-in. I suspect the signature box at the bottom of WRC & ERC Stewards reports is a result of the lack of any viewer logging in the Sportity system and I assume the box is there so that, in the case of a fine for example, there’s no excuse that the competitor didn’t see the notice because there was no phone signal, or the battery was flat etc. I’ve looked back at a few similar Stewards decisions on ERC & WRC events on Sportity and all except this one have been signed by the competitor or a team representative. The fact that this one isn’t signed might tell us something about the attitude of this competitor.

  3. Likes: WRCStan (5th June 2026),wyler (5th June 2026)
  4. #103
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,912
    Like
    786
    Liked 834 Times in 484 Posts
    There is signed by from the hand of, just like the stewards do; and there is 'digitally signed by' to substitute. Without further evidence or digital footprint, the boxes on the decision reports are just the author of the document filling in a field, if it is a signature, it needs to be clear 'signed by'. So I don't think we can see signatures/acknowledgements.

    I don't know if their system is robust or not behind closed doors but it doesn't look good viewing from the public perspective.

  5. #104
    Senior Member PLuto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Zlin
    Posts
    8,970
    Like
    570
    Liked 4,215 Times in 1,913 Posts
    It is interesting to follow this discussion. As private messages are not working here, can you (Steve, WRCStan and wyler) write me email to pluto@rallysport.cz?

  6. #105
    Senior Member Jarek Z's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Wroclaw
    Posts
    9,304
    Like
    5,120
    Liked 3,600 Times in 1,949 Posts
    It turns out that Suninen's crashed was caused by the anti-cut pole:
    https://www.fiaerc.com/en/news/sunin...erc-plan-clear
    http://www.rallymadness.prv.pl - rally photos and movies!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •