Results 91 to 96 of 96
-
30th May 2026, 16:34 #91Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2021
- Posts
- 1,902
- Like
- 781
- Liked 832 Times in 482 Posts
Let me confirm it's a comparison and I don't actually have evidence to say you're a racist, nor have power to ban you.
But you are keen to clear your name, just like the driver in the days after.
He is not my friend. I've only seen what the rest of the internet saw, except the bit that makes him a guilty man. And I think there is problem with the process.
And somebody who supports AI would question it too.
-
30th May 2026, 16:39 #92Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2021
- Posts
- 1,902
- Like
- 781
- Liked 832 Times in 482 Posts
Similar theme, comments on this guy have been despicable too: https://nypost.com/2026/05/30/sports...t-french-open/
-
Yesterday, 08:27 #93Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2019
- Posts
- 1,076
- Like
- 243
- Liked 651 Times in 359 Posts
all your "paragraphs" are based on a partial video, barely audible, when on the opposite side there's an audition report, validated by the signature of the drivers themself that confirms the entirety of the reports, both gesture and wording. no appeal was submitted, nor any further legal action (afak).
i definitely "misread" 'cause i couldn't believe people can fake arguments to justify man's sexual misbehaviour.
sadly, that's probably still a thing.
-
Yesterday, 09:03 #94Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2021
- Posts
- 1,902
- Like
- 781
- Liked 832 Times in 482 Posts
You misread because you didn't read the IF at the start of my post, and you've an assumption that I'm defending him. I'm not going to apologise for applying critical thought.
Please can you link to this signed 'audition' report, it would help as I've not seen it. Thanks.
-
Today, 08:19 #95Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2019
- Posts
- 1,076
- Like
- 243
- Liked 651 Times in 359 Posts
-
Today, 15:40 #96Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2021
- Posts
- 1,902
- Like
- 781
- Liked 832 Times in 482 Posts
Thanks, but there's no validatory signatures like you said, unless you can point them out? The timeline alone suggests refusal to agree with it but 'Failure of the competitor to acknowledge within reasonable time' after allegedly having been verbally told of the decision tells me that they didn't agree with it. And I'm guessing the exonerating footage was inaccessible in parc ferme.
I think 'well they didn't appeal or take legal action' attitude is deaf to reality. It immediately costs thousands of Euros and an unknown lot more.


Reply With Quote

Well, he's not breaking any rules, you can't really punish him, but it's unsportsmanlike.
[WRC] Acropolis Rally 2026