Quote Originally Posted by skarderud View Post
And, these fines, in what juridicsium is they placed?
That's the FIA appeals process. Roughly the right € without checking, point is it's easier to destroy people than they can defend it. I've seen many times people in authority use a system to destroy people. If you support Amnesty International maybe you should put a closer consideration on this IMO. You said:

Quote Originally Posted by skarderud View Post
I dont feel sorry for this driver, its unacceptal behavior, whatever some here think.
We all know the alleged behaviour is unacceptable, but you don't have any clear proof, comment or reason that the driver did the unacceptable behaviour.

The only thing to go off is the stewards document but here's where I'm sceptical, Kolcak and his team didn't sign it, so for me it's inadmissible as evidence to what he actually allegedly agreed to in the hearing anyway, and he's also not directly quoted. That's pretty irregular.

That was published 2.5hrs after the hearing, which took place 6-8hrs (?) after the incident. Sorry but no humans are this perfect - driver, scrutineers, CoC, stewards. I'm assuming nobody had the benefit of the video, imagine being asked to precisely recall something you passively said/did 6-8 hrs ago. It could easily lead you to apologise for any inadvertent offence caused without fully understanding the circumstances that an apology could turn out to be a full admission of guilt to something else you don't agree to. Had the stewards said "if you agree that this is what happened you will be DSQ and your reputation will be in tatters", do you think he would have agreed to it? If so why the protest? Even the steward who wrote the hearing document might be struggling to remember what was precisely said.

As an example point, you've just accepted your ban when I baselessly said you made a monkey gesture.