Fred Vasseur ‘only has until this summer’ to save his Ferrari job as F1 driver headache emerges.
Fred Vasseur ‘only has until this summer’ to convince Ferrari not to sack him according to F1 paddock rumours.
1 March 2026
Ben Evans
F1 Oversteer

Journalists Rebecca Clancy and Mark Mann-Bryans were speaking on the Inside the Piranha Club Podcast about Ferrari. Clancy suggested: “I think Fred Vasseur is under pressure as well. You mentioned there about the talk last year about his job not being safe, and then obviously they gave him a new contract in July. But obviously the rumours in the paddock now are that actually he still only has until this summer, and if the car isn’t performing by the summer then his job is at risk.”

“So I think if only he had the headache of whether to pick Leclerc or Hamilton, he would love that; otherwise, I think we could see more change and more disruption within Ferrari.” Mann-Bryans replied: “Nothing but winning is enough, is it for Ferrari? Let’s be honest. It doesn’t matter really. You can take as many podiums as you like. But to the tifosi, it’s all about being on the top step and winning those championships.” A report from the Swiss outlet Blick has also suggested that Vasseur is ‘under pressure’, with the Italian media ‘sharpening their knives’ already.

‘Only has until this summer’;

https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/fre...dache-emerges/


Lando Norris issues McLaren rally call over F1 title defence
Lando Norris enters the 2026 F1 season aiming to defend his drivers' championship.
1 March 2026
Fergal Walsh
RacingNews365

Lando Norris has suggested McLaren is not in a position to compete for an F1 title with its current car following the end of pre-season testing. When asked if he feels a responsibility to defend his title this year, Norris told media including RacingNews365: "Honestly, I don't think there's a responsibility... I mean, there's a responsibility always in life.

"But I'll do my best to defend it and continue it. But it's a new season with loads of new challenges. So it's not as simple as just continuing from last year and saying it's the same thing again. At the minute we have to, from what we see, improve the car quite a bit if we want to compete a bit more, to be confident for the first race."

"I feel confident. I feel better than I've ever done," he said. "Certainly, after last year and winning the championship last year, that's given me the confidence. So it's reassuring to know that I've done it once and therefore I believe I can do it again. So that's a good thing. But it's a long season, and I'll make sure I do my part. And together as a team, we'll make sure we give ourselves the best opportunity to do it again."

‘McLaren is not in a position to compete for an F1 title’;

https://racingnews365.com/lando-norr...-title-defence


McLaren have sacrificed downforce to build ‘more agile’ 2026 F1 car on the minimum weight limit
1 March 2026
Ben Evans
F1 Oversteer

McLaren have built their car slightly differently to the rest of the grid to create a ‘more agile’ machine compared to their rivals. Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri will both have their sights set on the drivers’ championship again after two years of having the quickest car on the grid. However, McLaren have already acknowledged that they don’t expect to be the leaders in the paddock at the beginning of 2026 due to the changing regulations. Mercedes already have a power unit advantage over McLaren due to their familiarity with the new engine.

However, there are suggestions that McLaren’s gearbox is class-leading this year, and with drivers looking set to spend far more time in first gear to charge up their batteries, being able to put that extra load through the gearbox is going to be essential. Journalist Mark Hughes has now had confirmation that McLaren have shortened their wheelbase this year. It makes Andrea Stella’s team an outlier in the paddock and comes with its own pros and cons.

‘More agile 2026 F1 car’;

https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/mcl...-weight-limit/


What repeat of Honda's last F1 nightmare means for Aston Martin
1 Mar 2026
Scott Mitchell-Malm
The Race

If or when Honda sorts things out, objectively assessing the quality of the car will be critical. Newey's delayed arrival played a role in the chassis being at least somewhat compromised at the start of this year. Aerodynamic development was some kind of combination of paused/reset/delayed in the first months of 2025 until he came in. That means three or four months were effectively lost, whether because previous work was reconsidered or because development was consciously held back to avoid wasting allocation before he could validate it.

Organisational changes followed and that may be to Aston Martin's advantage long term, but it does not create extra time in the short term or the stability that top teams thrive on. There's bound to be some kind of clash between expectations and reality - or in other words a gap between what kind of progress Aston Martin demands and what Honda can deliver. It'll be a matter of striking a sensible compromise.

But even if there is low-hanging fruit, climbing from where Honda is now to a midfield baseline by the second half of the year would represent significant progress. A podium-contending package within one year would require an extraordinary turnaround. The more plausible arc, if the base architecture is right, is gradual: stabilise this year, build a stronger performance and reliability platform into the next, and only then think about sustained frontrunning potential. That's how it played out post-2017, after all. It's whether Honda has the time and the resources to do it again.

‘Striking a sensible compromise’;

https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/h...-consequences/


Alpine admits to concerns over unique new F1 car feature
28 Feb 2026
Anirban Aly Mandal
Motorsport Week

Alpine boss Steve Nielsen has said the team is “nervous” over its unique interpretation of Formula 1 rear-wing design for 2026. Speaking to media including Motorsport Week, Nielsen admitted that it does make the team nervous, especially when no other team has decided to approach their rear-wing designs in a similar vein.

“Of course it does,” he admitted. “It would probably be a better question to answer later in the season, but when you’ve had the year we had last year, of course, you take comfort from that, and with the many. When something is unusual, it doesn’t mean that it is wrong, and we did it for our own reasons, but of course, you do think: ‘Wow, that’s not the same.’”

“It is an obvious difference, but whether it is the right direction or the wrong direction, who knows? We are evaluating everything, absolutely everything, together with what we see on other cars. If we see something, we model it, and we try to reproduce it.”

“Nervous”;

https://www.motorsportweek.com/2026/...1-car-feature/


Gary Anderson surprised more F1 teams didn’t copy Ferrari’s 2026 power unit solution
1 March 2026
Ben Evans
F1 Oversteer

One of the biggest talking points during pre-season has been the power units, with the FIA announcing changes to the way compression ratios are going to be measured midway through the 2026 season and then again in 2027. However, Gary Anderson has admitted that Ferrari’s turbo solution could be a masterstroke, and he’s surprised no other power unit manufacturers considered the same solution.

Anderson was speaking about Ferrari’s new power unit on The Race F1 Tech Show and explained: “This turbo, the requirement for the drivers to put 11,000 RPM on the engine to get turbo speed up and the fact that Ferrari seem to have an advantage in that area with what’s called a smaller turbo. The thing about this is that all of the PU manufacturers, all of the teams, even will know how much electrical energy they used last year driving the MGU to get that turbo up to speed for the start line because last year it was invisible, but you had the electric motor on the turbo. So they will know how much they had to do that on a start line for their given turbo size.”

“I’m surprised that some PU manufacturers don’t seem to have ever looked at that at all, or even car constructors haven’t looked at that at all. Ferrari, if they’ve done this because they’ve actually looked at it all and said this is what we need, then fantastic, pat on the back to them all. If it’s just because their philosophy is running the smaller turbo, which it has been for the last few years, and by luck, it’s ended up helping them off the start finish line, then that’s fine. It’s interesting that the other teams didn’t have a look at it because if you’ve got the big turbo, you need to run higher RPM to get the exhaust flow and get the turbo speed up.”

‘Ferrari’s turbo solution could be a masterstroke’;

https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/gar...unit-solution/