Page 33 of 33 FirstFirst ... 23313233
Results 321 to 328 of 328
  1. #321
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    224
    Like
    9
    Liked 142 Times in 54 Posts
    I have understood the Hyundai has to be driven more agressively to be fast with it. Tänak has mentioned in many cases, that the car itself drives unnaturaly for him and he likes to drive differently.

    Tänak obviously has driven over the limit in many cases and a smart drive would have been better. Still the Portugal response from FX seems like lame excuse to shift the responsibility to Tänak. If you want to win, then you have to be the fastest and if the car breaks with this speed, then it is not strong enough. Toyotas haven't had this kind of issues for a long time anymore.

  2. Likes: flat_right (Today)
  3. #322
    Senior Member flat_right's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    622
    Like
    474
    Liked 536 Times in 216 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by trykmann View Post
    If you want to win, then you have to be the fastest and if the car breaks with this speed, then it is not strong enough. Toyotas haven't had this kind of issues for a long time anymore.
    Agree with that 100%

  4. #323
    Senior Member EstWRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    15,304
    Like
    6,980
    Liked 12,642 Times in 5,501 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by trykmann View Post
    I have understood the Hyundai has to be driven more agressively to be fast with it. Tänak has mentioned in many cases, that the car itself drives unnaturaly for him and he likes to drive differently.

    Tänak obviously has driven over the limit in many cases and a smart drive would have been better. Still the Portugal response from FX seems like lame excuse to shift the responsibility to Tänak. If you want to win, then you have to be the fastest and if the car breaks with this speed, then it is not strong enough. Toyotas haven't had this kind of issues for a long time anymore.
    This!

    If you want to see aggressive style then watch how Fourmaux drivers or Lappi back in the day. That’s aggressive style

  5. #324
    Senior Member EstWRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Estonia
    Posts
    15,304
    Like
    6,980
    Liked 12,642 Times in 5,501 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by deephouse View Post
    And I guess last year he didn't drive anywhere agressively, especially there, when he bin it completely on several ocassions
    I don’t get this argument. Ogier binned three rallies in a row last year, was he also driving aggressively then?

  6. #325
    Senior Member flat_right's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    622
    Like
    474
    Liked 536 Times in 216 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EstWRC View Post
    This!

    If you want to see aggressive style then watch how Fourmaux drivers or Lappi back in the day. That’s aggressive style
    In case of Fourmaux and Lappi, they are/were all the time sideways or power sliding. That is one form of aggressiveness.

    But you can also be aggressive when you brake very late and accelerate hard, cut corners and use road edges, you are very committed (staying flat-out over crests, jumps, or blind corners, trusting pace notes or not taking slow when there are rough places on the stage), high physical inputs from driver.

  7. #326
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,843
    Like
    3,648
    Liked 9,973 Times in 5,375 Posts
    The engine that failed for Tanak was actually from Fourmaux ! Tanak took his car after Paraguay because it had a new transmission.

    As Tanak finished Rally Chile to get 1 point, this means for CER someone in the team will either get the car with dodgy engines, or a 5 minute penalty...

    https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/what-...means-for-cer/

  8. #327
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,434
    Like
    652
    Liked 707 Times in 396 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    The engine that failed for Tanak was actually from Fourmaux ! Tanak took his car after Paraguay because it had a new transmission.

    As Tanak finished Rally Chile to get 1 point, this means for CER someone in the team will either get the car with dodgy engines, or a 5 minute penalty...

    https://dirtfish.com/rally/wrc/what-...means-for-cer/
    There should be 6 other cars each with 2 engines at the other end of Bavaria.

    But interesting how they changed the plates from Fourmaux in Paraguay 924, to Tanak in Chile 914 which was his in Sweden 926. I'm sure it's all tickety-boo.

  9. #328
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Milkyway -> Earth -> Europe -> Slovenia
    Posts
    1,199
    Like
    95
    Liked 459 Times in 266 Posts
    Hyundai? Where is that 4th car, you loudly talk at the beginning of the season? We all know Neuville will not be the one, who will get this car.

    I just hope, that the car he will receive will not fail again, which is highely likely it will somehow.
    Last edited by deephouse; Today at 18:16.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •