Page 50 of 50 FirstFirst ... 40484950
Results 491 to 499 of 499
  1. #491
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    2,928
    Like
    10
    Liked 390 Times in 219 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    I can see the old R5 & Rally2 Cars going on and on for years, dropping down the rally levels like the Subaru's and Evo's before them.
    I think you actually mean that old R5 & Rally2 cars will disappear from the higher levels over the next few years. There are already people using Rally2 cars on local single-venue club events - there's nowhere lower for them to go!

  2. #492
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2024
    Posts
    743
    Like
    186
    Liked 180 Times in 125 Posts
    "The WRC27 cars and current Rally2 machinery will run in the same class, with both cars chasing overall rally wins and the overall world championship title."

    that was my biggest doubt. im 10000000000000000% happy if we have only R5s for 2027 or so.

  3. #493
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    887
    Like
    474
    Liked 105 Times in 39 Posts
    Seems like these regulations are still somewhat vague as we still haven't heard any firm confirmation about anyone making a WRC27 car, with the championship less than 18 months away. Normally we hear at least rumours about new entrants years in advance before they actually hit the stages. For those who have been here for awhile, do we all remember the 'village idiots' coming with that new car!!! I wonder how those village idiots are doing now? Oh, that's right, they are winning everything. Anyway, back on topic...

    My main concern is will the compulsory 10 cars put tuners off? Totally fine for Toyota or even M-Sport, and I can see where the FIA is going with this, but for a small tuner this is a massive investment without necessarily being about to sell them to customer drivers.

    I do think the FIA is doing the right thing by easing the homologation rules and inviting tuners into the mix. Hopefully we will see a new era of WRC as we are seeing a new era in WEC. Teams such as Glinkenhaus, Vanwell and Isotta Fraschini could almost be interpreted as tuners. They were there (unfortunately all withdrawn now) mixing with the established manufacturers like Toyota, Porsche, Ferrari, Peugeot etc in endurance racing which was great to see, but they didn't have to make 10 compulsory cars. Is this going to be the thorn in the side of these new regulations?

  4. #494
    Senior Member Eli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    4,281
    Like
    4,036
    Liked 1,675 Times in 969 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maui J. View Post
    Seems like these regulations are still somewhat vague as we still haven't heard any firm confirmation about anyone making a WRC27 car, with the championship less than 18 months away. Normally we hear at least rumours about new entrants years in advance before they actually hit the stages. For those who have been here for awhile, do we all remember the 'village idiots' coming with that new car!!! I wonder how those village idiots are doing now? Oh, that's right, they are winning everything. Anyway, back on topic...

    My main concern is will the compulsory 10 cars put tuners off? Totally fine for Toyota or even M-Sport, and I can see where the FIA is going with this, but for a small tuner this is a massive investment without necessarily being about to sell them to customer drivers.

    I do think the FIA is doing the right thing by easing the homologation rules and inviting tuners into the mix. Hopefully we will see a new era of WRC as we are seeing a new era in WEC. Teams such as Glinkenhaus, Vanwell and Isotta Fraschini could almost be interpreted as tuners. They were there (unfortunately all withdrawn now) mixing with the established manufacturers like Toyota, Porsche, Ferrari, Peugeot etc in endurance racing which was great to see, but they didn't have to make 10 compulsory cars. Is this going to be the thorn in the side of these new regulations?
    I just think that 10 years ago (wow I can't believe it's been 10) Toyota announced that they would join the WRC in 2017 for the new regulations and there was already speculation Kris Meeke would join them...now, it's August 2025 and no manufacturer even from the existing ones can say they'll be there for sure until 2029....yes for sure Covid didn't help, but you'd think that in 10 years...someone would say they're joining, I honestly hope these regulations help or the WRC will die out before the next 10 years.
    Only you know your true potential.
    #42 #For_Craig

  5. #495
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    8,889
    Like
    2,139
    Liked 2,258 Times in 1,212 Posts
    In order to homologate one of these cars do manufacturers have to be comitted to entering a full WRC campaign?

    If so there's two ways that could go.. either we get more manufacturers competing at the top, or we get fewer manufacturers building rally cars overall (when you consider Rally2)

  6. #496
    Senior Member flat_right's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    601
    Like
    470
    Liked 531 Times in 213 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maui J. View Post
    Seems like these regulations are still somewhat vague as we still haven't heard any firm confirmation about anyone making a WRC27 car, with the championship less than 18 months away. Normally we hear at least rumours about new entrants years in advance before they actually hit the stages. For those who have been here for awhile, do we all remember the 'village idiots' coming with that new car!!! I wonder how those village idiots are doing now? Oh, that's right, they are winning everything. Anyway, back on topic...
    By "firm confirmation" do you mean new entrants? Because from the "old dogs", Toyota has said/hinted publicly that they are building a car and during Rally Estonia, I spoke with one Toyota member and he confirmed they are definitely building a new car already. When I asked about others, the said that Ford maybe but with Hyundai he said that he doesn't know as I think even in Hyundai no one knows.

    https://www.rallit.fi/toyota-pomolta...la-niin-kauan/

    "But in general, you can say that it takes about a year to design a car and it takes another year to test it. The rules have been available for six months, so you can tell from it where we are at, Fowler agrees to reveal."

  7. #497
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,681
    Like
    3,630
    Liked 9,926 Times in 5,343 Posts
    The timescale is just too tight as I said before and Mikkelsen confirmed he has been told by everyone but Toyota.

    It looks like the best we can hope for is Toyota WRC27 Cars vs the existing Rally2 Cars.

    But how will they feel if their customers in their old Yaris Rally2 car beats them ?!

  8. Likes: RS (Today)
  9. #498
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    190
    Like
    9
    Liked 141 Times in 53 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post

    But how will they feel if their customers in their old Yaris Rally2 car beats them ?!
    There is nothing a small software update wouldn't fix

  10. #499
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    35
    Like
    22
    Liked 48 Times in 16 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maui J. View Post
    My main concern is will the compulsory 10 cars put tuners off? Totally fine for Toyota or even M-Sport, and I can see where the FIA is going with this, but for a small tuner this is a massive investment without necessarily being about to sell them to customer drivers.
    Supposedly they have the whole season to do it.
    And imagining it's a 3 car team, with only the team cars the numbers would be already close. 3+3 because of logistics with overseas rounds and 1 or 2 test cars.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •