Ferrari director ‘rushed’ to stop Charles Leclerc ‘exploding’ as unplanned meeting emerges.
Ferrari sporting director Diego Loverno stopped Charles Leclerc ‘exploding’ in the media in Hungary.
7 August 2025
Kyle Archer
F1 Oversteer

Given the Monegasque’s fury over their radio, Auto Sport Web reports that Ferrari sporting director Diego Loverno ‘quickly rushed’ to speak to Leclerc after the Hungarian GP. Loverno was desperate to meet Leclerc in parc ferme and stop him ‘exploding in front of the media’. Loverno did not plan on speaking to Leclerc as soon as he got out of his SF-25 last Sunday. But, given how the Ferrari Driver Academy product’s race unravelled, the Bologna native did not want to risk Leclerc potentially continuing to vent his anger while he spoke to the media.

Ferrari sporting director Loverno’s frantic words in Leclerc’s ear right after the Hungarian GP seemingly did the trick, as the Monegasque then appeared to tow the company line and put his issues down to a possible chassis issue rather than blaming his engine or tyre pressures. But, while the Scuderia seemingly tried to hide the true cause for his collapse, how Leclerc’s race unravelled left them entering the summer break on a low. Hamilton was even only able to qualify and finish the Hungarian GP in P12 for the Briton’s worst classified result this year.

It has even been suggested that Ferrari’s rear suspension upgrade debuted at Spa has failed if Leclerc’s Hungarian GP unravelled due to fears about excessive skid plank wear. The team hoped the upgrade would let them run the SF-25 lower to the ground and unlock its speed.

‘Stop him exploding in front of the media’;

https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/fer...eting-emerges/


What we know about Leclerc's strange Ferrari 'disaster'
Aug 4, 2025
Jon Noble
The Race

The way that Charles Leclerc's hopes of victory in Formula 1's Hungarian Grand Prix were derailed - by a poor final stint that Ferrari labelled a "disaster" - has prompted a great deal of intrigue. While a detailed explanation has not been forthcoming yet, the focus is very much on it being a car problem as opposed to anything power unit-related.

This is why Leclerc used the word "chassis" in his post-race remarks to the media as a general remark, rather than it being an actual broken monocoque. As Vasseur later clarified: "When he says chassis, it's because it has nothing to do with the power unit. Now we don't know exactly what happened."

The most likely explanation remains that something broke in the car and that triggered a loss of grip, which then manifested itself in the tyres sliding and overheating and the balance being derailed as a result. But it may take a deep dive back at Ferrari's Maranello base to fully understand things.

‘Great deal of intrigue’;

https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/w...rari-disaster/


Gary Anderson rejects George Russell’s ‘wacky’ Charles Leclerc theory after Hungarian Grand Prix problem
5 August 2025
Rory Mitchell
F1 Oversteer

Gary Anderson explains why George Russell theory on Ferrari struggles is ‘wacky’. Ferrari has been dealing with the issue of excessive plank wear for most of the season, after both Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton were disqualified in China. Russell’s suggestion would be consistent with those problems, but Anderson has explained why it would be tricky for Ferrari to make such a “strange” decision that would impact the driver on track.

“What Russell suggested is a bit wacky and far-fetched in my opinion. A team would not reduce performance in this way just to stop plank wear. There are numerous other, better and less dramatic solutions,” wrote Anderson. “Firstly, you would change the set-up of the car, running the rear of the car stiffer or raising the ride-height slightly to reduce plank wear. Yes, there will be a performance loss but not to the extent we saw after his last stop.”

“When it comes to tyre pressures, again, it seems unlikely. If you put the rear tyre pressures up you are guaranteed to lose performance from the rear tyres overheating. Doing this on a track where traction is absolutely critical is crazy. As we have seen in the past, Ferrari make some strange decisions but I do not for one second think that Russell is on to anything here. These changes are too much of a compromise.”

‘Gary Anderson explains why George Russell theory on Ferrari struggles is wacky’;

https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/gar...-prix-problem/


Ferrari still looking for answers after last stint “disaster” for Leclerc in Hungary
AUGUST 4, 2025
Adam Cooper's F1 Blog

The Hungarian GP had a thrilling conclusion as Oscar Piastri failed to dislodge leader and McLaren team mate Lando Norris, but it could have been even more intriguing had Charles Leclerc still been in contention. We’ll never know if one or both McLaren drivers would have passed him without a fight had he not been slowed by a still mysterious issue in the last stint of the race that ultimately saw him drop to fourth, behind George Russell.

As we know F1 cars can be incredibly sensitive to aero damage – in Hungary Oliver Bearman was forced to stop after he experienced similar symptoms to Leclerc, and afterwards the Haas driver had no explanation as to how any such damage had occurred. After retrieving Leclerc’s from parc ferme the Ferrari crew found nothing visibly obvious in terms of aero damage that could have been responsible, and still had no answers as of Monday morning.

‘Ferrari still looking for answers’;

https://adamcooperf1.com/2025/08/04/...rc-in-hungary/


Ferrari concerned Charles Leclerc wouldn’t finish F1 Hungarian GP due to car issue
3 Aug 2025
Jack Oliver Smith
Motorsport Week

Ferrari boss Fred Vasseur believes Charles Leclerc was “lucky” to finish the Formula 1 Hungarian Grand Prix after a chassis issue thwarted his chance of victory. Vasseur revealed that the team will “investigate” if part of the chassis had indeed broken, but was concerned that Leclerc would even make the chequered flag.

“Well, I must say that the situation was quite strange,” he told media including Motorsport Week, “that we were under control the first 40 laps of the race, that we were very in control the first stint, a bit more difficult the second one, but it was still manageable. And the last stint was a disaster, very difficult to drive, that the balance was not there and, honestly, we don’t know exactly what’s happened so far.”

“It means that we have to investigate if we have something broken on the chassis side or whatever, but at one stage I thought that we will never finish the race, that we can be lucky in this situation to score points of a P4. But yeah, it’s very frustrating for us because I think we did the first pole position of the season. “The first two stints went pretty well and we lost completely the pace and the pace of the weekend on the last run, but yeah, it’s tough.”

‘Lucky to finish’;

https://www.motorsportweek.com/2025/...chassis-issue/


Ferrari are ‘brainwashing’ Charles Leclerc as mysterious pattern emerges in his post-race interviews
6 August 2025
David Comerford
F1 Oversteer

Leclerc raged at Ferrari over the radio during the race, telling them ‘you have to listen to me’ and suggesting that they had taken the management of a mystery car issue into their own hands. He described the situation as ‘incredibly frustrating’. Charles Leclerc keeps doing the ‘criticise-and-retract routine’ at Ferrari. Speaking after the race, Leclerc struck a much more measured tone. He said his impression in the cockpit was ‘wrong’ and that the problem in question was beyond Ferrari’s control.

“In the car obviously I had no idea what was going on,” he explained. “I mean I had an idea, but it was a wrong idea because I thought it was something that was in our control. Unfortunately we had an issue on the chassis, so I don’t have much to add on that. It’s just extremely frustrating when you are fighting for a win and when we had the pace that we had at the beginning of the race, and we lose absolutely everything later on, it’s very frustrating.”

On the Auto Motor und Sport YouTube channel, journalist Michael Schmidt suggested that Ferrari had effectively ‘brainwashed’ their driver before he’d faced the media. That prevented him from being totally ‘honest’. “I think there was a bit of brainwashing going on between [Leclerc getting out of] the car and these press conferences and TV interviews,” said Schmidt. “He obviously says in the car what he thinks and what his feeling is. I think that was more honest than what he said afterwards.” ESPN journalist Nate Saunders has observed that Leclerc keeps adopting the ‘criticise-and-retract routine’. There is a ‘feeling’ that he may be too much of a ‘nice guy’ and needs to be harder on the team to drive them forward.

‘Criticise-and-retract routine at Ferrari’;

https://www.f1oversteer.com/news/fer...ce-interviews/