Page 7 of 31 FirstFirst ... 5678917 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 302
  1. #61
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Milkyway -> Earth -> Europe -> Slovenia
    Posts
    1,164
    Like
    94
    Liked 455 Times in 263 Posts
    They could open and have it all, and then all manufacturers have conditions to get involved. You know when thing is restricted, there is always one, which can't get involved, because they don't sell that shit, the WRC offer.

  2. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,014
    Like
    344
    Liked 3,907 Times in 2,040 Posts
    It is hilarious when people here argue about how much of a fire hazard batteries in EVs are and then suggest using pressurized hydrogen instead.

  3. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2024
    Posts
    638
    Like
    150
    Liked 156 Times in 106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mknight View Post
    It is hilarious when people here argue about how much of a fire hazard batteries in EVs are and then suggest using pressurized hydrogen instead.
    hehe true, tho at the same time, 99,9999% of both motorsport and 'road' incidents with fire in the whole history of "cars" were caused because of petrol, so...

  4. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,014
    Like
    344
    Liked 3,907 Times in 2,040 Posts
    To me it seems that at WRC level most fires are caused by hot exhaust parts getting into contact with either vegetation or other parts of the car. So it is petrol, but indirectly.

    There is a recent history of fires caused by fuel tank issue with Polo R5 and Fabia R5, but that issue seems more like an exception.

  5. #65
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,268
    Like
    3,580
    Liked 9,815 Times in 5,265 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by deephouse View Post
    They could open and have it all, and then all manufacturers have conditions to get involved. You know when thing is restricted, there is always one, which can't get involved, because they don't sell that shit, the WRC offer.
    But like VHS vs Betamax, someone is going to lose and do so in a very public way.

    Maybe WRC could use Rally2 cars, factory and private teams, for a few years, until the car industry decides what fuel is really going to be the future.

  6. Likes: skarderud (4th September 2024)
  7. #66
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,748
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    Maybe WRC could use Rally2 cars, factory and private teams, for a few years, until the car industry decides what fuel is really going to be the future.
    Why again? Just why?

    This idea is as dead as the Monty Python parrot.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  8. Likes: deephouse (4th September 2024)
  9. #67
    Senior Member Mirek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Prague / Eastern Bohemia
    Posts
    22,748
    Like
    7,917
    Liked 11,413 Times in 4,538 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by saco0o View Post
    hehe true, tho at the same time, 99,9999% of both motorsport and 'road' incidents with fire in the whole history of "cars" were caused because of petrol, so...
    Except it's not true. Hydrogen is pretty safe. With hydrogen in open spaces you vitrually can't ever get a vapor explosion or self ignition. The reason is that unlike gasoline, methan etc. it is far ligher than air and therefopre never concentrates in an open space. When it's leaking it just dissipates in the air and nothing happens. It also requires far richer (and virtually impossible in open space) concentration for self ignition than gasoline vapors. Plus unlike gasoline or battries it's not toxic.

    Of course you can't shoot the pressurized tank but you can't do that with petrol tank or a battery either.
    Stupid is as stupid does. Forrest Gump

  10. Likes: manthey (5th September 2024)
  11. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,311
    Like
    611
    Liked 679 Times in 374 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    Why again? Just why?

    This idea is as dead as the Monty Python parrot.
    It's not dead, no manufacturers are coming, end of. The technical standards discussion is moot. Manufacturers want out, now the Promoter wants out. If the FIA end up promoting their own series again, this is what they'll do, as it's what they proposed earlier this year when they were unwittingly acting like the Turkey voting for Christmas.

    Sure with a healthy championship I will say the same, it certainly isn't a target, but the championship is very, very sick.

    Only thing I will say to Eddie is that the car industry isn't coming back, ever.

  12. Likes: Fast Eddie WRC (5th September 2024)
  13. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2024
    Posts
    638
    Like
    150
    Liked 156 Times in 106 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    Maybe WRC could use Rally2 cars, factory and private teams, for a few years.
    yes

  14. #70
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    6,014
    Like
    344
    Liked 3,907 Times in 2,040 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Mirek View Post
    Except it's not true. Hydrogen is pretty safe. With hydrogen in open spaces you vitrually can't ever get a vapor explosion or self ignition. The reason is that unlike gasoline, methan etc. it is far ligher than air and therefopre never concentrates in an open space. When it's leaking it just dissipates in the air and nothing happens. It also requires far richer (and virtually impossible in open space) concentration for self ignition than gasoline vapors. Plus unlike gasoline or battries it's not toxic.

    Of course you can't shoot the pressurized tank but you can't do that with petrol tank or a battery either.
    Right then I guess this explosion never happened:

    https://www.fleeteurope.com/fr/new-e...fety-questions

    (Link is first search hit, but it was everywhere in the news).

    Afterwards they found out it was due to wrongly installed valve that leaked. (So no shooting of pressurized tank). In either case after this the number of hydrogen fylling stations around Oslo went from like 6 to 1 and hydrogen car sales dropped to close to zero, while battery car sales are now at 94% of all new cars.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •