WRX is not a manufacturer series, WRC is not a privateer/teams series, they shouldn't be compared. Privateers and teams aren't travelling the globe as WRX shows, so why suggest privateers are the answer for WRC? Without manufacturer investment in WRC, the promoter has to step in and these working group decisions show they still choose a Rally1 top tier with the fewer cars.
WRC2 already exists and Rally2 is very popular to the point of oversubscription on European events, but it cannot sustain the series itself, nor multiple events for much of the participants. Why do people expect making either it or something indistinguishable from it as the 'main class' will a) attract privateers to compete globally full time when they weren't already, and b) save the series?
The main thing is that a global series like WRC can not live without manufacturer's money and big sponsors bound to them. Privateers can't fund the series as it is. That is simply impossible.
‘Mercedes are back’ – Wolff ecstatic with Australia 1-2 but admits ‘we have a fight on our hands’ with Ferrari.
“When it comes to Ferrari, before the race people were saying, you're going to...
Is Formula 1 just an updated version of Mario Kart?
Will China provide a more compelling race?
Will Toto be allowed to purchase the 24% stake in Alpine to keep Horner out of F1?
How many...
Lia's Hyundai Rally2 car for ARA 2026.
https://youtu.be/3SVm_N8Mqhg?si=h3vXR02WeuUncOY9
Bruce Wilson and the US electric rallycross car. What is different with this car and the European...
Ferrari should be quite happy with their result in the first race. It was a solid start to the season, even though it could have been a bit better. Overall the signs look promising and if they keep...
‘Mercedes are back’ – Wolff ecstatic with Australia 1-2 but admits ‘we have a fight on our hands’ with Ferrari. “When it comes to Ferrari, before the race people were saying, you're going to...
Formula 1: Articles & News...