Craig Breen

[Katvala]

People here are talking about Craig Breen's tragic accident. It is natural to think about ifs and buts, things that could have been done to prevent it. Even if it's too late for Breen, sure there are things that can be made safer for the future. There's a reason there are so many regulations changes for safety in the past decades. And talk about this is perfectly fine.

NOT's laughable insults and self-jerkings are not adding to the discussion in any meaningful way. His act is pitiful and he should be ashamed for sprouting this crap on a thread revolving Breen.

Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk

[macebig]

There are always lessons to be learned when someone loses his life doing his profession. It's up to the FIA and the Safety Commission to find out what these lessons are. Yes, it was probably a "freak accident" as was Martin's in GB 2005. But, that accident helped improved side protection quite a bit and saved a good amount of people. We can hope Breen's passing has a similar effect and helps save some lifes in the future.

[NOT]

remember "finnish village team"?

you have no clue what you're talking about half the time and you're in no place to talk down to people.

yes i remeber a finish village team full of finnish village nobodies that lost a championship to a private team... and once they brought people in apart from the clique of makienen which they kicked out like a worthless stray dog they started winning...

as i said i am never wrong...

[NOT]

the discussion in any meaningful way.

the main problem is the fact you are having discussions started by retards who question why we cannot wrap forests in bubble wraps... and you consider such discussion capable of being meaningful...

[Katvala]

the main problem is the fact you are having discussions started by retards who question why we cannot wrap forests in bubble wraps... and you consider such discussion capable of being meaningful...

I never agreed to doing that, but you don't see me lashing out on others pretending that I am some super intellectual individual like you are doing. If you are so wise, you could've given constructive critique. You are driving people away from having discussions here and it's clear that your contributions are heavily disliked because of your attitude.

Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk

[PLuto]

NOT has been banned for next 10 days

[Rallyper]

NOT has been banned for next 10 days

Are you serious? If we can´t hear (watch) words from everyone, even if their mental abilities of using words offends in certain ways, this forum will loose it´s function.

We´ve seen a lot of nobrainers here (Not only NOT) using words not even writeable. However they are also rallyfans.

Banning people only fits to dictators and some religions.

[becher]

Are you serious? If we can´t hear (watch) words from everyone, even if their mental abilities of using words offends in certain ways, this forum will loose it´s function.

We´ve seen a lot of nobrainers here (Not only NOT) using words not even writeable. However they are also rallyfans.

Banning people only fits to dictators and some religions.

Don't confuse free speech with the right to be a fuc*ing cu*t.

[Rallyper]

Don't confuse free speech with the right to be a fuc*ing cu*t.

I really don´t like words like yours either. But you use your freedom and say them as well...

[becher]

I really don´t like words like yours either. But you use your freedom and say them as well...

Well they discribe a certain behavior but they don't randomly insult people and discriminate certain conditions.