Results 1 to 10 of 28
Threaded View
-
13th March 2023, 20:28 #15
- Join Date
- May 2015
- Location
- Greenwich, London UK
- Posts
- 3,661
- Like
- 19
- Liked 824 Times in 681 Posts
Applying ballast to the winning car has been tried before. I vaguely remember it was used in F2 not too long ago. I personally do not like the concept as it is artificial and punishes success rather than reward it. I thought the point of the new chassis and its control sections of it was to ensure that the performance of the competing cars was not too broad such as to produce vast gaps in performance at any part of the grid. It is fair to say that there would always be at least two tiers to the grid due to financial effect and inherent technical capabilities of the top teams. But the regulated chassis should ensure the performances in each tier are always very close. I think they could reign in more sections of the chassis to bring about closer racing. There is clear enough flexibility in the chassis to allow one team to dominate in such a way as to remove any real hard-fought competition for the title. But to be fair, l agree that we should see a few more races before any criticism is made.
I think the idea of the reverse grid from F2 may help mix things up a bit and give midfield teams a chance to win races. If the race was split into two, with the point-scoring positions reversed for the second race. Or something of that nature.Last edited by Nitrodaze; 13th March 2023 at 20:32.
Better a witty fool than a foolish wit.
William Shakespeare
Online examination aid is particularly useful for students with multiple obligations, e.g., working individuals, foreign students struggling with language issues, or students taking intensively paced...
Who Can Online Exam Help Services...