Quote Originally Posted by seb_sh View Post
Latvala is maybe a bit of a special case because had a career so long his points maybe are a bit inflated. Still, remember he was the youngest winner at his time and for a while he was quite fast. In the end it's a data driven thing, that's the limit of the system.

It also doesn't take into account "potential". For example we all imagine Kalle will go on to win many rallies and titles but imagine if Kalle never wins a rally again and Evans and Tanak dominate him for the next 5 years, he starts to crash etc do you still think he is so good as you do now?

Kudos to Antti for putting in the work.
To each their own

IMO it’s more difficult to win a championship than to win a rally.

If Kalle wouldn’t win a single rally or championship again (which will never happen) then I would still rate him higher than Latvala.