Page 64 of 72 FirstFirst ... 14546263646566 ... LastLast
Results 631 to 640 of 716
  1. #631
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,427
    Like
    3,600
    Liked 9,852 Times in 5,291 Posts
    Soooooo, many weeks after Rally Sweden and there's still no info from Compact Dynamics about the reasons for Tanak's hybrid system fault. Not good.

  2. Likes: Sulland (7th April 2022)
  3. #632
    Senior Member flat_right's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    580
    Like
    464
    Liked 527 Times in 210 Posts
    Do you know for sure that there isn't? Maybe it's just it hasn't been shared publicly.

  4. #633
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,427
    Like
    3,600
    Liked 9,852 Times in 5,291 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by flat_right View Post
    Do you know for sure that there isn't? Maybe it's just it hasn't been shared publicly.
    Maybe, but the information is pretty crucial for everyone involved and even for the credibility of the WRC at the top Rally1 level.

    If the cause is known why isn't being released to the teams and if it has been why wouldnt they share it by now with Croatia coming up ?

  5. #634
    Senior Member bandit12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Туркменистан
    Posts
    308
    Like
    11
    Liked 315 Times in 136 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    Maybe, but the information is pretty crucial for everyone involved and even for the credibility of the WRC at the top Rally1 level.

    If the cause is known why isn't being released to the teams and if it has been why wouldnt they share it by now with Croatia coming up ?
    Too bad publicity for Compact Dynamics

  6. #635
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,342
    Like
    616
    Liked 692 Times in 386 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    Maybe, but the information is pretty crucial for everyone involved and even for the credibility of the WRC at the top Rally1 level.

    If the cause is known why isn't being released to the teams and if it has been why wouldnt they share it by now with Croatia coming up ?
    I'm willing to bet teams have the reasons, but it's not in anybody's interests to share publicly such detail - especially from CD, no company puts out press saying 'look how we failed'. Also, what more can we public do with such technical information about specialised propriety equipment?

  7. #636
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    GB, Manchester
    Posts
    2,754
    Like
    529
    Liked 2,362 Times in 1,058 Posts
    to me they should communicate more/better to keep fans up to date with their technology and how it goes, as they are the ,,rookies'' in WRC since this season and there are few people who really like that new concept (hybrid parts of the car).

    that one press release after Tanak's error was pretty poor and seemed like an answer form a guy, who was new to rallying (especially the time loss part)

    Put something out thru WRC or DFish, that we found the problem and are on the way fixing it, making sure such thing won't happen in the future. Would give some positive image to that hybrid thing.

  8. Likes: Fast Eddie WRC (6th April 2022)
  9. #637
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,427
    Like
    3,600
    Liked 9,852 Times in 5,291 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WRCStan View Post
    I'm willing to bet teams have the reasons, but it's not in anybody's interests to share publicly such detail - especially from CD, no company puts out press saying 'look how we failed'. Also, what more can we public do with such technical information about specialised propriety equipment?
    The reasons need to be made public so that the fans can understand and the sport can be seen as fair with the new (2 min) penalty award.

    Otherwise the WRC will be open to ridicule.

  10. #638
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    1,342
    Like
    616
    Liked 692 Times in 386 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TypeR View Post
    to me they should communicate more/better to keep fans up to date with their technology and how it goes, as they are the ,,rookies'' in WRC since this season and there are few people who really like that new concept (hybrid parts of the car).

    that one press release after Tanak's error was pretty poor and seemed like an answer form a guy, who was new to rallying (especially the time loss part)

    Put something out thru WRC or DFish, that we found the problem and are on the way fixing it, making sure such thing won't happen in the future. Would give some positive image to that hybrid thing.
    Disagree, that'll only remind average Joes who've forgotten that it failed in the past. Better than that is to have a clean Croatia, Portugal... as expected.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    The reasons need to be made public so that the fans can understand and the sport can be seen as fair with the new (2 min) penalty award.

    Otherwise the WRC will be open to ridicule.
    Near end of the season maybe, two rounds into a 3 season cycle is too early for anyone to say the kit slurs the championship when pre-season was full of teething-problem chat. I'm not sure what you would be expecting to hear but usually when it's a gearbox or engine problem we all accept it at that. Finding out precisely what happened to Tanak's unit won't make any more sense of the two or ten minute penalty decision. That surrounds balancing safety requirements.

    Could always try asking them?

  11. Likes: AnttiL (6th April 2022),Corcaíoch (9th April 2022),ouvreur (7th April 2022)
  12. #639
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    917
    Like
    233
    Liked 609 Times in 327 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Fast Eddie WRC View Post
    Maybe, but the information is pretty crucial for everyone involved and even for the credibility of the WRC at the top Rally1 level.

    If the cause is known why isn't being released to the teams and if it has been why wouldnt they share it by now with Croatia coming up ?
    it's known since the rally. heavy landing after a jump. the manus have "won" a pr challenge (2 min penalty), and don't need a statement that says "reason was bad car management". .

  13. #640
    Senior Member Fast Eddie WRC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    20,427
    Like
    3,600
    Liked 9,852 Times in 5,291 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by WRCStan View Post

    Could always try asking them?
    I've reminded the journalists at Dirtfish who raised the fact that there's been no info in a podcast a few weeks ago.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •